Princess Isaidso

Twitter and Face Book Creepyness

2012-01-10T19:30:00.000-08:00

January 10, 2011 A.D.

There is something deeply disturbing about people who are fans of Face Book. I cannot quite figure it out. It is one thing to have an account if you are a businessman or need it professionally. Or if you are famous. But "friends"? And family?

Sheesh. Pick up the phone. Write a letter. Go visit. Just stop being the creepiest thing since Tiny Tim. You face bookers are sorry excuses for human beings. Your "social" media does not make you better people.

I think the more one depends on "social" media for participating in "society" the more mentally unstable they are.

Get some mental health counseling. Or better yet find Jesus. Do something to help yourselves because you are deeply disturbed people.

Occupy Wall Street Protestors

2011-10-22T01:19:00.000-07:00

October 22, 2011 A.D.

In my princessdom there are no filthy complainers defecating in the streets or on the horses which guard my realm. The poor animals would kick them in the head if they did anyway.

But such is the sad case in America (Breitbart). Its wild savages are defiling the countryside.

Sadly Congressman Ron Paul, in the last presidential debate, used some poorly chosen comments to sympathize with the protesters. They deserve no sympathy, but being tenderhearted in nature, the Congressman sometimes has misplaced compassion.

These people deserve no such compassion. Millions of young people feel the same way. Millions of middle-aged people do too. And millions upon millions of elderly people feel betrayed as well. And most people believe the US government is the source of this problem.

Wall street and the banks didn't do anything that congress did not allow. Democrats in particular are in bed with the bankers and Wall Street. Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac are the tip of the ice-berg. General Electric and General Motors too. This economic fascism by the Obama administration is no pretty picture.

The silent majority which is losing its pensions and retirements, and the young people who cannot find jobs and are not defecating in the streets suffer no less. They have dignity and decency and will not act like these parasites.

The president and the leadership of the Democratic party upholds the degenerates in the OWS movement. And as they do they betray those who are suffering but choose not to behave worse than pigs or monkeys.

http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/10/10/ows-defecates-on-cop-cars-vandalizes-property-pelosi-says-bless-them/

A Treasured Moment

2011-10-12T21:23:00.000-07:00

October 12, 2011 A.D.

In these chaotic and fearful times I search for signs of happier days. Tonight, coming home from my short journey across town, I stopped for the railroad signal gates flashing their red warning lights. As I had slowly approached the gates, I turned off my radio, ventilation system, and rolled down the windows.

I heard the big diesel engine blast its loud horn. It was startling! And it was a sound I had heard from a distance throughout my life having lived in the industrial north. It brought chills to my skin as I remembered better days long ago.

Happier days.

I couldn't resist so I turned my car off and felt the gentle rumble of the long train as it passed by.

It was a beautiful moment on an October night. The happiness I felt roared away in the dark with the rumble of the rails.

Our Beautiful First Lady

2011-05-28T13:05:00.000-07:00

May 28, 2011 A.D.

She has not looked more beautiful. Please enjoy these (Getty/CBS) images (linked to below) of our first lady looking magnificent on her European tour with President Obama.

I especially like the elegant pulled-back look of her hair in the photos with the formal attire dresses (they are simply lovely).

http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/tim/2011/05/25/michelle_obama_style_1_540x405.jpg

P.J. O'Rourke Doesn't Know the Constitution

2011-05-19T16:54:00.000-07:00

May 19, 2011 A.D.

P.J. O'Rourke tries to take down Congressman Ron Paul for not knowing the Constitution (Salon).

But it is PJ pajama man who doesn't know it. PJ says that the bill to fund health care for the merchant marines (coming out of the 5th congress) is proof that health care is a lawful power of the federal government.

This is simply ridiculous. The merchant marines were around during the War of Independence before the navy or the coast guard were formed (Wikipedia). They provided military service before the US government or the Constitution was established and they reaped the just rewards which would one day be covered by the Constitution itself as a legitimate power of the Federal government by the enumerated power of the congress to raise an army and navy.

There is NO enumerated power to fund health care for people not serving in military roles. The funding power derives from the enumerated power to raise armies as covered in Article One Section Eight of the Constitution. And all veterans are already covered. So there are no other people left to cover since only SOME people are veterans.

If O'Rourke would like all Americans to sign up to capture pirates and serve in military roles on the high seas (including babies, toddlers, and old women) then he can claim to be following the lead of the Founders.

Rick Unger at Forbes points out that money was docked from the pay of the marines. In the commie fantasy O'Rourke envisions everyone gets government health care even before they ever earn a paycheck or serve in the military. Or maybe we should all be destined to be Spartans and just presume everyone will be in the military?

The previous article by Unger, which outlines how this first "health care" legislative act snow-balled into more and more health care programs which went beyond veterans' health care proves the theory of the slippery slope should be removed from the list of logical fallacies, because slopes are always slippery and should always be anticipated. And the merchant marine health care act has been very slippery. Unger says so in more ways than one. But instead of condemning the unlawful expansion of the original act Unger appears to cheer it on.

And if PJ is correct then why didn't the founders have free medical care too? And why not their wives? Or their children? And so forth? Hmmm????? Gee, it is mighty suspicious that we don't find such a thing for the public in general until the 20th century.

If the government wants to follow the lead of the early congress then they can take care of military vets who serve this country now and need medical care.

Oh wait. They already do that. It has been done since the government took care of the merchant marines who engaged in warfare on behalf of the new states of America.

O'Rourke is a nitwit who successfully earned a lot of money for it. Frankly, I thought the guy fell off the planet long ago. He must be an old buzzard by now and his lack of reasoning suggests he might be flying into windows more often these days.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Merchant_Marine

http://open.salon.com/blog/paul_j_orourke/2011/05/17/ron_paul_says_founders_ignorant_of_constitution

http://blogs.forbes.com/rickungar/2011/01/21/thomas-jefferson-also-supported-government-run-health-care/

http://blogs.forbes.com/rickungar/2011/01/17/congress-passes-socialized-medicine-and-mandates-health-insurance-in-1798/

What is Wrong With Retards?

2011-04-07T23:46:00.000-07:00

April 8, 2011 A.D.

What is wrong with retards? You can even be one and become president of the USA.

President Obama arrogantly announces that if you don't like the amount of money you have to pay for gasoline, you can trade in your car and buy a hybrid. (Hot Air)

And the rest of us peons who bought the best fuel efficient cars we could afford several years ago and still cannot afford gas prices?

I suppose we should just go to hell?

Can you say "sociopath?"

http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2011/04/07/cant-afford-gas-for-your-car-trade-it-in-rubes-says-obama/

President Obama Disses Academic Testing

2011-03-28T18:18:00.001-07:00

March 28, 2011 A.D.

I'm surprised that the president did not tell a recent Hispanic audience that any white person testing their child did so because they were the enemy of Hispanics. Yahoo news has this story about the President criticizing testing students. (Hat tip Drudge)

According to the article, Obama says testing makes learning boring. And he would like to measure achievement by things like school "attendance". Perhaps this means you get A's if you show up all the time.

But Democrats are in a pickle.

They can continue to destroy the education system with fads like New New Math, Whole Language, and other such scams and get criticized, or they can cover it all up by eliminating the testing which shows what a failure they are. Whatever they do, it will be obvious and show how evil and stupid they are.

Democrats have whined and sniveled a good deal about testing since scores have taken a dive over the years (especially after the 1965 immigration act, by-the-way). But they cannot (yet) escape the international testing which shows that especially blacks and Hispanics do poorly on them. And if you take their test scores out leaving in white and Asian scores, US kids compare very well with the countries that do better in international tests like the IAEP.

This probably embarrasses the president. Maybe it enrages him.

So what does the president suggest we do about this?

He suggests hiding the truth. Offer less clarity. Provide less transparency about academic achievement. Give excuses about boring tests. Avoid the problem by pretending it isn't there.

Openness in these matters conflicts with his political ideology in which he believes everyone should be equally rewarded despite their merits. And if blacks and Hispanics cannot keep up academically how will they reap good rewards he believes they should have?

I wonder if our nitwit in chief suggested trade schooling for young people who are not college bound? Doesn't he know how much an electrician or plumber earns per hour? Why didn't he promote trade schools for kids who are not college material?

Obama says "[a]ll you're learning about is how to fill out a little bubble on an exam and little tricks that you need to do in order to take a test and that's not going to make education interesting."

"All" you are "learning"? Is he nuts? Who believes that is all anyone is learning? Stupid snots from Harvard?

Many kids are learning much more. Maybe he should speak for himself and blacks. Maybe that is all they are learning. And by his conduct it appears to be true. He really does appear to be the big Bubble-Filler-In-Chief who learned nothing and got a Harvard degree for it. But it seems a little arrogant for him to assume that is all other people learned. Or that that is all Hispanics are capable of learning. The Bubble-Filler-In-Chief needs to speak for himself. It is also a tad arrogant for him to believe that that it is all that whites or Asians are learning. If what the nitwit says were true how are we creating doctors, engineers, and scientists if all they are learning is bubble filling?

The Bubble-Filler-In-Chief is not to be believed.

Maybe he dislikes tests because he is stupid. But many, like me, who have struggled with learning, take the opposite view. We demand greater excellence in education because we recognize our own academic failings and we demand a higher standard for the future.

It has come down to this. You do not love your children enough if you keep them in a US public school where Marxist bubble-filler imbeciles like Obama wish to propagandize them instead of educate them. Don't get mad at me for saying so. Get mad at yourself for having children you must foist on others to educate. The least you could do is pay to send them to a private school if you do not wish to educate them yourself.

Stop being lazy and greedy. Take care of your OWN children.

If education doesn't really matter (and it's just bubble-filling and tricks) as Obama suggests, why worry about schooling in the first place? Fire them moronic union teachers abolish the schools, keep kids at home and give them a diploma. This is exactly where the stupid thinking of the Harvard grad leads.

Grow up and get your kids out of our Soviet style propaganda schools and give them a real education.

And the federal government has no authority whatsoever to have a Department of Education or any say so in academics. The schools belong to the states, locales, and the people. They don't belong to privileged Ivy league dirt-bags like Obama and the Democrats who use them as tools of social change, subversion, corruption, and sedition.

Abolish compulsory education in America. It is a communist scheme not worthy of a free people. Which is one reason why Obama supports it.

Choose liberty. Abandon the US public school system.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110328/ap_on_re_us/us_obama_education_2

March Madness Hits Lew Rockwell

2011-03-11T01:47:00.000-08:00

March 12, 2011

Earlier in the month, a Rockwell blogger pulled the race card as described in the posting below. Now another blogger is pulling the religion card describing Christianity as one which advocates violence between religions and other such nonsense.

Christopher Manion writes that Christianity is an "apocalyptic religious ideology that advocates violence between religions culminating in Armageddon, a worldwide holocaust, and the end of the world."

Christianity doesn't "advocate" violence, it predicts it. Much like people at Lew Rockwell predict the collapse of the US economy. Apparently, only libertarian bigots get to make predictions about the future. And anyone (a Christian) making an prediction about the violent nature of the human race is a crank even though predicting violence among human is as sensible as predicting the laws of economics.

Manion acts like violence didn't exist before Christianity and now that Christianity exists all of a sudden the human race is headed for a new and unexpected thing: future violence.

He furthers embarrasses himself with his "end of the world" comment. The New Testament never teaches the "end of the world". Manion is making that up. The NT teaches about the end of human rule over earth and its continued eternal nature in the future after Armageddon. It teaches about earth's renewal and perfection, and not about its end.

Manion is an ignorant boob who believes in a myth about the "end of the world" only to make fun of it. And perhaps in his haste to make stupid statements about Christianity, he forget to mock the apocalyptic nature of Islam's day of judgment with the return of the Mahdi (Wikipedia). This amounts to: Christian apocalypse: bad. Muslim apocalypse: okey-dokey. It's likely that Manion just doesn't know much about Islam either.

There is a lot of this type of thinking by Rockwell libertarians.

They do seem to favor the Muslims. Why don't they mind defending a religion that advocates sexual slavery and having sex with children? Don't they know that Mohammad did those things, and everything he did (except for the number of wives a man may have) is to be emulated by Muslims?

I'm sure Manion thinks he is smarter than Christians. If so why did he get so much wrong about Christianity? And why wasn't he equally annoyed with Islam? Imperial Islam was founded by a religious leader who led a rampaging military across the Arabian peninsula attacking the innocent, raping, robbing, and enslaving. Such behavior is to be ignored?

Jesus didn't lead an army. He didn't attack the innocent. He never had sex with a nine-year old and he didn't rape sex slaves which he traded with his friends. But it's Christianity which is to be mocked at Lew Rockwell.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/81935.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahdi

Libertarian Nitwitery At Lew Rockwell

2011-03-10T15:21:00.001-08:00

March 10, 2011 A.D.

Harvard is now allowing the ROTC back onto its campus because the US military's Dont' Ask Don't Tell policy has been abolished.

In a brief blog post at Lew Rockwell online Stephan Kinsella quotes an idiotic statement made by his friend. It reads “Isn’t it great that we live in a country where both straight and gay can bomb the browns?”

This is the kind of thinking that makes conservatives think libertarians are left-wingers. Pulling the race card out like this when it is totally irrelevant is what Democrats do. And pulling it out in regard to this story ignores our entire history. Our revolutionary war was fought by white people against white people: white colonialists against the white British.

Our Civil War was white against white too. It was a white president killing white residents of the US south (and it wasn't about slavery either). World War One was whites against whites as well. And World War Two, the same. It was white Anglos against the white Germans and the French. Shall we throw the Japanese in the mix for fairness TO the "browns"?

Then the USA (and all us white folks) spent nearly 50 years in a cold war against, you guessed it, white people in Moscow and their captive lands.

Mr. Kinsella and his friend are nitwits. If we took their logic we would have to rationalize that white Americans hate their own race so they spent several centuries slaughtering them because they favored brown people who now don't deserve their fair share of the process.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/81595.html

Royal corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.

The Middle East Uprising

2011-03-01T14:48:00.000-08:00

March 1, 2011 A.D.

Muslims are not interested in freedom. Never fool yourself to believe it. Only an former Muslim might be interested in freedom. This uprising is about a replacement of despots. And despotism is what the totalitarian "religion" of Islam creates.

Royal corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.
.

Prisoners Storm Wisconson Legislative Chambers?

2011-02-25T19:32:00.000-08:00

February 25, 2011 A.D.

It looks like a band of roving criminals have overtaken the legislature in Madison, Wisconson. But for the calm of legislators, one could easily mistaken the threatening aggressive people in prison-orange colored T shirts as escaped convicts.

Democrats do always have the appearance of criminals. And it's no different in this video (also below) of their stampede. Decent Americans do not like this sort of thing and Democrats will garner no sympathy from them with this kind of behavior. Mind you I said "Americans". The people in T shirts loathe America. And they consider their neighbor someone to fleece instead of someone to love. And that is what the anger is about. The video below demonstrates why the word union is very often associated with the word thug. Notice the Hitler-type salute.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5f0VProvuAo

Royal corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.

I See Something and I Want To Say Something

2011-02-09T18:36:00.000-08:00

February 9, 2011 A.D.

Super Bowl update.

I SEE Janet Napolitano as a totalitarian, jack-boot thug who advocates the sexual molestation of innocent women and children at airports by government officials and I am SAYing so. And I SEE Janet Napolitano works for the same government which terrorizes us with terrorists by inviting Muslims to immigrate to America for the purposes of setting up a police-state (the US government's newest jobs program).

And I am SAYing so.

But who do I say it to? The despotic tyrants who are creating the terror?

Further reading on "See Something Say So":

http://www.infowars.com/big-sis-tells-super-bowl-attendees-%E2%80%9Csee-something-say-something%E2%80%9D/

http://www.nationalterroralert.com/2010/12/06/if-you-see-something-say-something-comes-to-walmart/

http://www.politico.com/blogs/politicolive/1210/Napolitano_see_something_say_something_campaign_isnt_Big_Brother.html

I Doubt President Obama Is Upset About Wiki Leaks

2010-11-29T05:07:00.000-08:00

November 29, 2010 A.D.

The President of the United States detests the United States. And so I wouldn't doubt for a moment that his fellow travelers in the state department, or wherever the leak is coming from, feel the same way too.

Obama needs to destroy America as we who love her know her (despite her sins). This is a good way to help do that. Now, I don't support the abusive USA foreign policy. But I also don't support these leaks.

I believe the leaks are intentional by the Marxist wing of American politics: the entire Democratic Party. And though the president may give a little protest. I believe it is for show. He has lied in the past and I have no doubt that he continues to do so.

Keep Your Bed-Bug, Pestilence-Ridden Shopping Bags Out of the Grocery Store and Market Please

2010-10-28T06:20:00.000-07:00

And thank you very much.

It is one thing to put on your laundered clothes and head off to the market for an afternoon of shopping and receiving your goods in sanitary, pest free, and clean shopping bags which no one else has used.

And it's a whole other thing to head to the store with lice-ridden, bed-bug infested, heaven-knows-what-infested smarmy, shabby, faux clothe shopping bags likely never laundered ever and hand them to the cashier or clerk and hand them back bugs popping off along the way on the counter, on the employees, and eventually ONTO MY FREAKING STUFF!

These environmentalist third-world lovers are a menace to society and health.

http://princessisaidso.blogspot.com/2009/04/isaidsoland-threatened-by-extremist.html

http://princessisaidso.blogspot.com/2009/06/cloth-shopping-bags-pandemic-flu-vector.html

http://princessisaidso.blogspot.com/2009/10/update-on-cloth-shopping-bags-old-bags.html

Libertarian Limitations

2010-10-19T04:46:00.000-07:00

I think the best of Libertarian thought represents what the Bible refers to as "the wisdom of this world". This wisdom differs from what rattles around in the brains of the sleazeballs on the left who are often very bright intellectually, but always, totally, morally corrupt and evil. Leftists (liberals, progressives, Democrats aka Democratics) utterly lack that form of wisdom which is best described as common sense.

Libertarians, on the other hand, are chock-full of common sense and have a deep seated joy for and love of liberty. Democrats, of course, despise liberty.

Libertarians, though very bright themselves, don't have it in them (remember the liberty thing) to be the diabolical vicious creeps Democrat and leftists must ultimately become in order to achieve their goals for others. People like Howard Zinn, Noam Chomsky, and Arianna Huffington are good examples of this type of leftist super intellectual who appears on the surface to be interested in righteousness but never really finds it because to achieve their goals they must by force of arms through the totalitarian state reach it.

Thereby they wind-up creating more and worse unrighteousness in the world because of the nature of their corrupt ideas and the vicious means used to apply them. Naturally, the idea of virtue is lost sight of (like it was with Stalin, or Hitler, or Mao), but it never occurs to these people AHEAD of time that that is where they are headed. Their despotism (though benign in the beginning) is the result of accepting any means to achieve their goal, including cruelty, brutality, and slavery. They pursue virtue, but don't know what it is.

Libertarians usually avoid the evils leftists like Zinn, Chomsky, Marx, Obama and the Democrats are always destined to create. They care too much for liberty to force others to think like themselves. The Chomskys and Obamas of the world do not.

Libertarian intellectual prowess often winds up expressing itself as a form of super common sense.

I deeply admire that.

And in my opinion common sense is superior to most forms of intellectual genius. Geniuses, as it often seems to turn out, can be the most dangerous persons among us when they attain absolute or arbitrary powers. It is against the nature of a lover of liberty to get that dangerous. Yet libertarians can, because of their optimism and general sweet-nature, fall prey to evildoers (like Huffington).

This Libertarian knack for common sense (which I believe the Bible calls "the wisdom of this world") seems to have some shortcomings when it comes to some complex philosophical disquisitions or judgments about the greatest issues in life outside of economics and liberty. You might ask what could be greater? That is a good question. What is greater than those two things is that which permits them to abound. And that is what I wish to discuss in regard to Islam and Muslims.

What kind of grave intellectual or common sense errors do I mean? One example seems to be quite common these day: Libertarians are not rightly reasoning about Muslims. They seem oblivious about a group of people who would, at the drop of a hat, deny them liberty faster than any fascist Democrat or Republican alive.

There are exceptions to this sympathetic view of Muslims among influential Libertarians. Neal Boortz for example. He is not too keen about the Muslims. But he cannot stand religious people in general, so it doesn't take much thinking on his part to stake out a position on it and lump the Muslims with other religious persons he detests.

Friedrich Hayek (the "father" of modern Libertarianism) would disapprove. He considered customs and traditions, including religion, which existed before we arrived on the planet to be important in the development of the human race and worthy of approaching with great care. He was no iconoclast. So he considered religion one of those important traditions that, as he said, lay "between instinct and reason" and formed the foundation of economic life, community, trade, etc.* These customs and traditions provided for the organization of humanity into civilizations to their betterment and for their survival. In other words he did not treat religion like Boortz does. And Hayek was not even a religious man.

But this isn't about eggheads like Boortz. This is about influential Libertarians who recognize some value in religion and wish to apply it to today's problems. To be most fair to the Libertarians and their seeming sympathetic consensus about Islam, it is important to note that the Libertarians are always making a genuine effort to be fair to others. This is to be commended by all rational people.

On the other hand leftists (liberals and progressives, Democrats) don't know what fairness is and are not interested in finding out. They are completely deranged, depraved, and demented about every moral issue before us. So I cannot even grant that they genuinely care about fairness. Yes, it is that bad.

It appears that Libertarian opinion about Muslims at this time comes mostly from their justifiable and righteous outrage about the phony war on terror and the illegal war against Muslims in several Middle East countries. Unfortunately, their opinion doesn't also come from an honest investigation about the history of Islam, the life of Mohammad, or the Koran. If Libertarians do have some background study on the subject and still defend it, it is not easy to understand why they would be Libertarians. Islam is against Libertarian values. On the other hand, Christianity: not so much. Mohammad had adulterers beaten, Christ told them to stop it. This is a very big difference and totally agreeable with Libertarianism.

I am in agreement with many Libertarians about this unjust and illegal war in the Middle East. They are right to be outraged. I am outraged. But, unlike the Libertarians, I am not distracted by my country's illegal and immoral treatment of Muslims such that I am unable to discern the evil doings and genuine threat coming from Islam.

I think a person can easily be capable of both understanding that America is greatly responsible for some of the trouble with terrorism and honestly critique the dangerous of Islam and the Koran.

Knowing who Mohammad was is essential for understanding what Islam is today. But it doesn't sound like Libertarians (especially those at Lew Rockwell) have a clue who he was. The latest example of Libertarian misunderstanding about Islam can be found in a recent article at Lew Rockwell online by Allan Stevo called "Three Reasons Why You Cannot Trust A Christian or Jew".

The author isn't claiming that you cannot trust a Christian or Jew. It is about outsiders wrongly interpreting the Bible such that they come to the wrong conclusions about Christianity or Judaism. The point he tries to make is how that many people are actually doing this with the Koran and Muslims. Of course, some people are taking the Koran out of context and that is wrong. But this is not what I refer to.

I refer to Allan Stevo taking the whole Koran out of the context of Mohammad's life, the context of the life of his contemporaries, and the context of Islamic history. He is thereby guilty of doing that which he accuses others.

Islam is different from Christianity in many ways but especially in a way which is pertinent to Mr. Stevo's article. Both the Koran and the Bible urge adherents to live like their founders. Christians are to live like Christ and Muslims are to live like Mohammad. Just about everyone agrees to these interpretations.

The problem arises with how Mohammad lived his life. And Stevo never mentions this. It is astounding that he doesn't. It is tragic. It is a profound and grave intellectual and moral error.

Very little about how Mohammad led his life is in question. And virtually all of how he lived his life comes to us by and through the writings (and witness) of his coreligionists who loved and adored him and would never publish or promote anything they thought would demean his reputation. Mohammad's greatest supporters loved and adored Mohammad for everything they agreed long ago that he did in his lifetime. We know about Mohammad from those who loved him.

What did Mohammad do?

Well, many normal things of course. But according to Muslim tradition, Mohammad was the leader of an army of tens of thousands of Muslim believers. These people plundered, killed, and conquered vast territories in the Arabian peninsula during Mohammad's lifetime (obviously) under his military leadership. They attacked innocent people. They raped women. They took property by force. This alone should send up a warning flag to the Libertarians.

I've never seen that flag go up.

After they conquered the Arabian peninsula (and soon after Mohammad died) the soldiers continued the expansion of the Muslim empire into the greater Middle East territory under the authority of Mohammad's successors. This pattern, as established by Mohammad and his disciples and soldiers, continue over several centuries eventually spreading as far as Spain and Constantinople. This conquest was a political act, not a religious one. But the religion always brought up the rear.

Libertarians normally loathe imperial behavior and are usually quick to condemn it. Yet, from their writings, it appears they don't recognize that Mohammad established a pattern of political conquest which has been faithfully practiced for over a millennium and continues today throughout the world as seen in places like Darfur. That pattern is Imperialist.

Why do the Hindus in India have nuclear weapons? You can be sure that Islam is the reason. Last century the Muslims committed democide against nearly 1 million Hindus in Bangladesh. How else would Islam have spread so far and wide? Does anyone really volunteer to be a member of a religion that it is punishable by death to leave?

I don't think so.

Islam spread out by force. Once they controlled territories, the religion followed. And since one becomes a second class citizen if one remains outside the faith, over time, Islam becomes the prevailing belief of those captured territories. Islam teaches no compulsion in religion, but this is a lie. If you are being abused by your Muslim government because you are not a Muslim, eventually, in order to have a better life, the only choice you may have is to become a Muslim. This abuse is a form of compulsion.

It is very un-Libertarian.

Stevo uses taking New Testament scripture out of context to prove that others are doing the same to the Koran. But it is a bad example because of WHO the founders of those faiths were.

Christ and his disciples never established a pattern of warfare. They never participated in conquest or subjugation. Several hundred years after they established the faith, Christians were brutalized and chased from place to place. This is opposite of what Mohammad and his adherents faced for the first several hundred years of Islam. They were predators.

The comparison is thus ludicrous and I can only assume it is based on ignorance or dishonestly.

The earliest Muslims gained and wielded political power through violence and terror. They politically subjugated most everyone they attacked. They did this to acquire territory. They did not do this to make converts. They did it to have empire.

That is what Muslims believe is their holy calling today. What Mohammad and the early Muslim believers did is exactly pertinent for today since the option to emulate Mohammad is always on the table for them. If western countries let Muslims waltz right in without a whimper, so much the better for Muslims. And so much the faster.

This doesn't excuse the Libertarians for not being as hard on Muslims as they are on Democrats or Republicans, Marxists, or Fascists (all one in the same much of time).

I reckon Libertarians have this flaw because many Libertarians do not possess the best wisdom--the wisdom from above which can only be imparted by God. Without this wisdom, even common sense falls short in addressing contemporary problems because such problems require providential knowledge only an all knowing being could possess. In fact, it was Hayek (who I believe is correct) who said that it is impossible for any man or any group of men to have that kind of current knowledge about pressing problems. And that is why individualism is superior to collectivism because millions of individual acts done using personal knowledge without direction tends to be overall more productive than collective acts done through with central direction which doesn't have access to the same kind of personal knowledge. This lack of detail by the centrist is what causes widespread inefficiency and catastrophe, as well as denial of liberty ). But God has the kind of knowledge that Hayek didn't believe humans could have. And he lets the people he gives it to act independently. And, according to the Bible, that knowledge (wisdom) is POURED out on certain Christians.

Which Christians?

The ones who specifically ask for wisdom. That is all it takes to receive all the wisdom one needs to proceed in this life with the greatest impact.

Stevo's comparison between the religions and taking verses out of context is riddled with structural intellectual errors. The verses of Koran and New Testament have to be understood within the context of the lives of its founders and the history of their earliest believers. Stevo himself takes the Koran out of its total context--the context of Mohammad's biography (supplied by Muslims) and the context of the historical record (most of it provided by Muslims).

Mohammad (in the text of the Koran itself) chided Muslims who refused to attack and kill for god. Even if this was meant only for those believers of the past, no such concept was ever found to exist by Christ or his disciples. Instead, the disciples suffered beatings, jail, and deprivation (rather than stealing).

And still, to this day, the Koran implores adherents to emulate Mohammad and all he did.** This cannot be erased and cannot be taken out of context. Stevo seems to ask us to take the words of the Koran out of the context of Muslim history.

There is another glaring intellectual omission Libertarians appear to be guilty of making. They completely ignore or are unaware of the fact that Mohammad had slaves--including sex slaves. He traded in them. He had sex with them.

Jesus never had a slave and he most certainly never had a sex slave. And there is no historical record of his adherents saying he did and priding themselves in it. He didn't trade sex slaves like Mohammad did. He never pleasured himself in his sex slaves like Mohammad. (Remember, everything Mohammad did was holy and can be emulated without reproach today INCLUDING sexual slavery). Now I understand, based on the sexual-slavery issue, why Obama and the Democrats are so fond of Islam and Muslims, but it doesn't make sense that Libertarians are, even if only for the sake of their own daughters and sisters.

The fact is that Muslim believers kept this record of Mohammad's sexual slavery and trading in the annuls of history themselves BECAUSE they considered it virtuous. It isn't in the historical record as an lesson about what not to do (as is much of what is evil in the Bible intends to do). Mohammad's sexual slavery practices was part of the glowing report about his life according by those who adored him. The sexual practices of Abraham, King David, and Solomon are part of the record as lessons in what NOT to do.

Though it is true that the New Testament addresses the issue of slavery in a sense that makes modern man recoil, but had to be so handled because about half the Roman world was in slavery. Christianity provides a path leading from slavery, but that path was not through chaos or anarchy. And what it actually did teach was the abolition of slavery by teaching that the slave should be the master and the master the slave. Certainly the New Testament never allows for sexual slavery. And a woman or a girl has every moral and biblical right to defend herself (as was taught in the Old Testament) even if it led to killing her attacker. The Bible never teaches anywhere that a slave holder has a right to rape. Sex is always reserved for husbands and wives: one husband with one wife. Anything other than this is sin.

Not so with Islam. A female captive has no such right. The man has every right to rape her.

Jesus wasn't a polygamist either. And he never took a child bride. Both practices are to this day holy and sacred according to Islam. That Muslim people might be moving away for this is only an indication of pressure from outside the Muslim world and does not represent any kind of reformation of Islam or rewriting of the Koran.

The Old Testament disapproves of polygamy over and over again. God set His pattern for man and woman with Adam and Eve alone. When he reset the human race with Noah and his family, this too was it was one woman for each man: Noah and his one wife, and so forth.

Likewise, in the New Testament and starting over with the second Adam--Jesus Christ--we again see the old, ancient, and original pattern for mankind with one man and one woman in marriage. Every example of polygamy in the Old Testament is an example of heartache, corruption, and cultural decline. To read about the train-wrecks in the lives of these polygamous families and assume God is approving of it is anti-intellectual . And since it is usually men who approve of this scam, it is also perversely self-serving.

Furthermore, every instance in the New Testament, where marriage is the topic, the female in question is referred to as a woman, not a child. A child is not to marry. In Islam, it is considered virtuous for an elderly man to marry even a prepubescent girl. Did the Muslim god make a mistake? No, not according to Islam.

This is utterly loathsome and nothing can be done to correct it though Muslims might wish there could be. The Koran approves of it for Mohammad, for the Muslim man, and for as long as time is.

No one in their right mind looks at this and shrugs their shoulders, then wrings theirs hands about the of contextual misunderstandings by outsiders. I have in mind here people like Barack Hussein Obama whose father and current family members are Muslim. And I have in mind the imbecile, George Bush, who said the Muslim and Christian God are one in the same.

What Mohammad did isn't merely relegated to obsolete customs. The Koran isn't written that way. All that he did is current and up-to-date (except for the parts that the Koran abrogates). The "truth" is always current, is it not? Yes it is and Muslim logic is inescapable.

The Koran never abrogates child brides nor sexual slavery. To the Muslim it is forever true. The Libertarian must recoil, but they are silent.

Yes, many Muslim lands try cover up this unseemly aspect of their faith, but they are whistling in the dark. They are in denial. So what can you say about a billion or so people who love such a leader as Muslims have themselves portrayed to the infidel?

And why are Libertarians trying to defend Muslims in the way Allan Stevo did by comparing them to Christian or Jewish beliefs taken out of context? This is apples and oranges.

The answer is probably the limitation of common sense and the wisdom of this world uninformed by the true God of the Bible who only is able to provide those super details and bits of knowledge little man (or woman) isn't able to gather up for themselves because of the complexities of life. God says we won't have wisdom UNLESS we ask for it. I assume that Allan has not asked for it because he would not have made the gross intellectual errors which appear in his article.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig11/stevo7.1.1.html

*Friedrich Hayek, Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism

**Muslim men, unlike Mohammad, are allowed only four wives at any one time (though they can divorce as many as they want and have dozens of wives over a lifetime)

Calling All Shovels!

2010-10-13T13:52:00.000-07:00

The President of the United States, as reported in the New York Times, online, regrets having promoted his ~~stupid~~ idea about "shovel-ready" projects to help with unemployment.

Perhaps the shovels in question were meant for cleaning up the piles of crap lying around every time the President opens his big, fat, ignorant mouth?

And they thought George W. Bush was an imbecile.

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/13/president-obama-looks-forward-and-back/

Suspicision # 1: Why Good Girls Get Tattoos

2010-07-05T05:28:00.000-07:00

They are everywhere. Who is everywhere? Respectable white-skinned American females with tattoos. There are certainly respectable non-whites with tattoos, but I will let non-whites decide what that is about.

Mr. Michael Medved, the radio talk-show host, recently mentioned a study that indicates people who get tattoos are deviants or rebels. Now, I think being rebellious is a much better thing to be among those two categories, but I have a suspicion that something else is operating here as well.

Please, let me explain.

I know a very kind young woman. She is pretty, a young mommy, responsible, and a
self-confessed Christian. She is very smart, savvy, hip. She is quite on top on things.

She is moral. Decent. And she is white.

You could say she is a version of that Abby character in the television program NCIS who is a bizarre version of a classic American super-hero dedicated to truth, justice, and the American way. She is exceedingly sensitive about not hurting people or critters. Perhaps this type of tattooing that she represents is all indicative of a fad. But, unfortunately, this is likely a permanent fad. My acquaintance's tats are not so razor sharp or well done as Abby's. The real Abby doesn't sport all those tats either, many of them are fake.

Lucky her.

My Abby's tats are probably forever real. Or forever in this life, anyway. They are very large tattoos and several in number. And as real as her tats are so is the standard delusions and fetishes that appear to be tattooed on her conscience after having grown up in the US government schools.

One typical fetish she acquired at the government schools is that she is always to avoid even the appearance of prejudiced against minorities races and ethnic groups in America even if she is not being prejudiced. And she is to avoid this at the same time while her betters make her their object of prejudice and minority status through government policy, education, and social pressure. In other words she is to avoid complaining about being made a hated minority while it is occurring so that she doesn't look like a racist herself.

She doesn't understand this, but that is what is going on.

This young women never learned that her race and ethnicity (white protestant) is quickly headed towards hated minority status through official policies of the United States government and its immigration laws. She was (until I informed her) completely unaware of the fact that whites are, world wide, not only a minority group, but quickly becoming a minority group in the formerly majority white United States. This is genocide against her own race and she doesn't even know it is happening. And it is intentional and school teachers were agents of that plan even if they are not aware of it.

The look on her face after having received this information was a classic. Her teachers probably taught her self-loathing. And they probably taught her to hate her predecessors and thus herself. So, she was a little surprised to learn about her minority status in the world and the quest to make her a minority in her country.

Last week, I went to a pizza joint (it isn't a store, palace, or restaurant, so joint it is) and was waiting for my order. A lovely young white woman in her prime came in to pick up her very expensive order. She even paid in cash. Mine was a freebie, which is why I was even there. Yes, the Princess is on a tight budget these days.

The young woman appeared to be an educated woman making a good living as she was wearing those medical scrubs we see folks in these days. And I noticed she had one of those very popular tattoos at the back-of-the-neck. It was small and purplely. She had extremely white skin, much freckles, and lovely red hair. By all standards, she appeared very normal. She didn't rebel at having to pay for her order nor was she dressed like a slut.

The week before that I was at a Home Depot waiting in line to get assistance. As I waited (and waited) there was a young couple (I presume they were a couple) in front of me. The woman appeared any moment ready to deliver her baby. The baby was high set, maybe it would be a precious little girl.

Again with the tattoos. It was that back-of-the-neck tattoo and also one down on the outside of leg above the ankle bone. Perhaps there were more, who knows. She wasn't rebelling in any way I could see. She was even keeping her baby and not murdering it as the deviants in the Democratic Party would like her to do if she wished. Again, she wasn't dressed like a slut or acting like one. She appeared to be making changes in her dwelling in anticipation of the little human in side her.

All of this is a curiosity to me. And here is my suspicion about tattoos based on these three seemingly respectable young women and the many other similar women I constantly see in public.

Young white women, especially, may be getting tattoos because they are taught to hate themselves by their teachers because of slavery and prejudice in the past. These young women I refer to in particular appear to be punishing themselves for sins and crimes they have never committed.

So perhaps they mar their astounding beauty after having been brainwashed to hate themselves (and their race) as taught to them by their leftist teachers.

These smart pretty women mar their natural beauty while they agonize over marring the environment. This fetish they have about the environment also comes from their teachers. They are taught to cherish the environment, but they are not allowed to be a cherished part of that environment. They are evil outsiders to it and they are evil outsiders to it who have ancestors who once behaved badly. They are to be obsessed with keeping the earth beautiful because that is the way nature made her, but she is to punish herself as if she wasn't part of the nature or its beauty. The mode of punishment for the sins she did not commit is up to her.

So these young ladies seem to knock themselves down a few notches (to the levels of criminals and slaves--persons who are most often associated with tattoos) by their self-inflicted physical defacement in order to make a recompense for their ancestors.

They sacrifice themselves in volcanoes as nearly as they can even if there is no convenient mountain or anyone openly willing to toss them in to the gods of justice. Tattooing themselves and annihilation of their race from the continent through immigration will make the gods happy especially because these young women are innocent.

Perhaps it isn't just deviance or rebellion that the study was measuring (does one even measure something as "quaint" as deviance these days)? Perhaps some of this is white guilt laid young women during the bulk of their formative years by their teachers.

I think the researchers may need to go back to the drawing board.

Royal corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.
.

Marxists on the March: Hugo Chavez and His Marxist Food Shortage

2010-06-20T13:44:00.000-07:00

Readers might know about my Princess Prediction #2 (Obama Needs a Famine) that President Obama needs a famine, or the threat of one to bring the public to its knees. (Though an oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico will do in a pinch). Did I mention Obama is attempting to federalize the right to fish (feed yourself) in the USA (ESPN)? Oh, how convenient that happened just before a major disaster in fishing waters. Our president must be a prophet.

Nevertheless, famine is the common stock and trade for the redistributists and collectivists among us--Obama being a committed redistributive totalitarian collectivist who knows that such catastrophes are the perfect vehicle to take advantage of people, destroy their liberty and freedom, as well as their way of life.

Or as Rahm, the-violent-subversive-and-knife-wielding-Emanuel says : "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste" (Seton Motley, News Busters online).

Famine is a favorite tool used by collectivists to bring a resistant population to its knees and subjugated. There's is simply nothing like a little starvation (or the threat of it) to get people to agree to anything. This pleases despots of all stripes.

And so, Hugo Chavez has now manufactured a food shortage by government interference. He knew this ahead of time (because food shortages always happens with collectivism) or he is a person fairly ignorant of history.

Sean Penn must be proud, since, of course, Hugo was elected by "the people". Don't you feel better now?

In Sean Penn's world-view, the Venezuelan people voted for a tyrant to abuse them until the next election.

Those, who survive starvation or deprivation, of course.

http://princessisaidso.blogspot.com/2009/09/princess-prediction-number-2.html

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/seton-motley/2008/11/21/media-mia-emanuels-crisis-comment

http://sports.espn.go.com/outdoors/saltwater/news/story?id=4975762

Royal corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.

President Obama's Oil Spill Address

2010-06-12T15:22:00.000-07:00

We now await the consequences for Barack Hussein Obama's habitual reckless conduct as President of the United States . Best option: impeachment and removal. Next best: republican congressional landslide in November.

Royal corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.

Paul McCarthney Insults Half The Voters Of America

2010-06-04T17:27:00.000-07:00

Paul McCartney is on a Insult-Americans-Tour accepting the Gershwin Prize from the US Library of Congress. Maybe he was sad that there wasn't a Yassar Arafat Music Award?

Oh well, maybe next year.

While insulting Americans who did not vote for Obama, McCartney said how nice it was to have, as Pam Meister at Big Hollywood reports, "... a president who knows what a library is.” Referring to George Bush, of course.

The implication is that Obama is a reader, though I don't see any evidence of it. Even so, it would only prove that even when people do have access to libraries, spend time in them, check out their books, and take them home to read, they might never benefit from it in a meaningful way.

It seems that Americans are in a pickle--caught between two presidents who, whether they read vociferously or not, are dumb as dirt. We can only hope things will change.

And so, it now appears that book reading has even had little effect on Paul McCartney, as he wasn't able to keep himself from insulting nearly half of the voting public and doesn't seem able to understand that reading won't necessarily give us a good president.

Perhaps someone should send Mr. McCartney a copy of Miss Manners Rescues Civilization to read? Oh wait, that might be futile.

Never mind. It is probably a waste of time and money.

http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/pmeister/2010/06/03/classless-paul-mccartney-trashes-bush-in-front-of-obama/

http://www.amazon.com/Manners-Rescues-Civilization-Judith-Martin/dp/0517281503

Left Wingers Are All Wet

2010-05-05T14:43:00.001-07:00

It was left wingers, long ago, who started the bottled water phenomenon in America. Their media organs demonized public water systems and created hysteria and panic about contaminants in them. It became cool to use bottled water. Only the booboisie (as H L Mencken sometimes called regular folks) drank from the tap.

And now that there is a whole industry for bottled waters, the left is telling us we are bad by not using tap water.

Read about a city which is banning bottled water here. (WCBV Boston) Hat tip Drudge.

Left wingers are insane. During these times is it wise to injure another industry that workers need to put food on their tables?

I have an idea, fire the people who make such laws.

http://www.thebostonchannel.com/news/23320994/detail.html

Famine and Other Happy Marxist Activities

2010-05-03T09:38:00.000-07:00

I made a prediction (my second official one) that Obama needs a famine. Here is the prediction.

Now that there is a catastrophic disaster in the Gulf of Mexico which effects the food supply, I thought I would just remind you of my prediction.

Have a blessed day.

Oh, did I mention that President Barack Hussein Obama chums with an unrepentant terrorist/anarchist (Bill Ayers) and an America hater (Reverend Jeremiah Wright) who wishes that God would damn America?

No?

My oversight.

Apologies.

Royal corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.

Mr. President! Mr. President! Mr. President!

2010-04-28T10:22:00.000-07:00

Omygosh! Omygosh! Omygosh!

There are Nazis also asking (perfectly innocent) citizens for their identification papers at all American airports, NOT JUST IN ARIZONA! The are hiding behind the alias TEE ESS AYE.

HELP! HELP! HELP!

Royal corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.
.

Global Crime

2010-04-28T05:08:00.000-07:00

Xinhuanet online is reporting that a Chinese citizen entered an elementary school with a knife and stabbed 19--18 youngsters and one teacher.

No doubt this was prompted by Tea Party members, violent TV watching and video game playing. And no doubt, George Bush, capitalism, Western Values, very bad knife laws, and Christianity.

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2010-04/28/c_13271059.htm

Royal corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.
.

Princess Isaidso NEVER Mocks Her Subjects

2010-04-16T18:58:00.000-07:00

It is very sad indeed to learn how that the leader of the "free" world mocks his ~~subjects~~ citizens (Hot Air).

Leaders who do this have, traditionally, over the centuries been the kind who wantonly murder their subjects or destroy their lives. Thankfully, America is a place where the people regularly dismisses its ~~Kings~~ presidents.

Never in America's history has this been so much a matter of life and death.

http://hotair.com/archives/2010/04/15/obama-mocks-tea-partiers-you-should-be-thanking-me-for-cutting-taxes/

Men and Sex

2010-04-10T17:57:00.000-07:00

What normal and sane person is not disturbed by the ubiquitous, unseemly, and obnoxious male enhancement and erectile disjunction commercials?

Now we have to be annoyed by the "sex is healthy for men" stories coming from science and the media. Gee, I wonder why all the focus on men and sex?

I'm looking for the studies that prove the women involved with these men have better health when that sex also includes marriage, a nice car and house, lovely clothes, a maid, and all that provided by the man along with his fidelity.

Oh, you say women cannot get everything they need to be most healthy?

No kidding Buster.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/03/09/healthy.sex/index.html

Nancy Pelsoi Is a Liar: Health Care is NOT a Right

2010-03-27T15:47:00.000-07:00

Princess Isaidso requires truth telling in her Princessdom. And so she is especially disturbed by the apparent lie being told by Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi of the United States of America.

This week she told her citizens that health-care is a right.

Okay, maybe she is stupid and doesn't realize that a right cannot be rationed by the Federal Government, because as our Founding documents clearly state, our rights are God given, not Gov given.

If health care is a right, then no one can ever be denied any sort of health care in any way if it can be afforded by an individual. 100 year old folks wanting a hip replacement, by-pass surgery, and expensive cancer therapy cannot be denied: it is their right, because Nancy said so.

Babies requiring expensive intensive care cannot be denied, it's their right. They cannot be denied a right.

Any American of any age, under the government program, who would be denied in the future any measure of medical care less than the high standards Americans have heretofore already had access to will be denied their rights by government according to the [false] moral framework Nancy Pelosi has proposed.

Or else she is liar and health care is not a right.

Anonymously Speaking: Social Networking and Google Buzz

2010-03-12T10:24:00.000-08:00

Here is an article at CNET News online, by Declan McCullagh about anonymity on the internet (and elsewhere). Full disclosure here: I am writing anonymously and Princess Isaidso is a fictional character.

The article at CNET is mostly about Google Buzz and other similar social networks. And the gist of the article is the subject of privacy. But, the drift of it is that privacy isn't good.

This is horrifying.

And I can only believe that people who think like this have already been stripped of their personal dignity and thus don't know that there ought to be something of themselves to protect.

Obviously, many of the people in the article pontificating about any negative aspects of privacy live with security systems, or in gated communities, or have body guards. The judge in the story lives under armed lock and key most of his working day. He even has special laws made just for him that protect him from verbal threats.

Now, why does he live that way if it is not because people are nuts and want to hurt him or those around him for the things he says and does?

And how come the judge isn't the FIRST to be out in the open? Why does he hamper public access to his courtroom? Why does he lock the doors to his car? And why can't we watch him take a shower? Surely he has nothing to hide from us, DOES HE? Or does the judge think he has a right to bathe privately?

Anonymity in communications is often required BECAUSE people are evil. Are there court cases which are sealed? Why are they sealed? Something to hide? According to the judge, yes.

You cannot be free if you show all your cards at all times. Why doesn't the judge leave his house unlocked? Wouldn't that be more transparent? Shouldn't we be able to go in it if we want just to check things out and make sure he isn't hiding something from us that would disqualify him from being a judge?

If the judge doesn't let us inside, then he must be hiding something bad?

How about the Google co-founder with the prison-orange T Shirt? Is he going to support transparency and let us rummage through all his financial records, business plans, retirement program, and travel itinerary? If not, why not? Isn't it better to have all this out in the open since "no one cares about privacy anymore"?

In China, you are not allowed to have privacy. This is because others have insisted on it. You have to open yourselves to community monitors (community organizers) who make sure you are not hiding something they don't like.

You better not even harbor private thoughts.

An attitude to force everyone out into the open is an effort to control others, intimidate, bully, and expose them to outright terror, if not murder.

Barbara Streisand (and many people like her), can afford to pay for security and live in a sort of prison because of the abuse by those who think they have the right to hound her. They demand transparency of her. They demand she expose herself.

Glenn Beck, who is making completely open and public comments, lives under constant death threats. His family including his children, live under this condition. Fortunately he can afford the security. Us nobodies cannot.

Anonymity would have kept him safe. Ms. Streisand would be more safe if the details of her property were kept from the public who has absolutely no right whatsoever to the information.

We cannot be secure if a third party is exposing our location without our consent and providing the exact arrangements of our property to those who don't know how to respect boundaries and wish to do us harm. There aren't enough police to keep us safe from that.

Oh, and what about the millions of people who shamelessly expose themselves to others without hardly giving a second thought? These are the people Aristotle referred to as "natural born slaves". They never worrying about subjugating themselves to the whims of others because as they possess the barest intellect or wisdom. They have virtually no self-respect or dignity.

These have no yearning for freedom of conscience nor any deep thoughts that they might wish to guard, protect, or express. These are often the very same people who hound the famous or want Glenn Beck dead.

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-20000336-38.html

Edict of Maltodextrin

2010-03-06T05:46:00.000-08:00

I Princess Isaidso, of Isaidsoland, do on this fifth day of March, the year of our Lord two-thousand and ten, do declare that no foods shall contain Maltodextrin whatsoever anywhere in my Princessdom.

It's enough already! Stop ripping out my gut for heaven's sake.

Sheesh.

Princess Isaidso's First Official Scientific Theory

2010-02-07T10:11:00.000-08:00

Speaking of massive snow falls, the mind leaps to visions of whale blubber. And that leads to the first ever Princess Isaidso scientific theory/hoax.

The question: Why Did Al Gore think global warming was happening?

The answer: Because he got so frikken lard-butt fat it just SEEMED to be unusually hot.

The evidence for this is as rock solid as the evidence about the melting time of the Himalayan glacier.

But probably more reliable.

The Uncivil Obama Calls for Civility

2010-02-05T06:31:00.000-08:00

At least President Obama is a consistent hypocrite and liar. That makes it easier to know what he really means.

The man who insulted the Supreme Court in front of the whole world is now asking for civility.

This is like the arsonist who sets fire to a building calling in for the fire department to come put it out.

It's not because he didn't enjoy it burning.

If Obama was interested in civility, he would have started off his statement about it with an apology for his own incivility LONG after many days, weeks, and months of proving to others that HE is civil.

To Retard Or Not To Retard: That Is The Question.

2010-02-04T09:40:00.000-08:00

At first I was tempted to make a post that said only this:

"RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD,
RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD,
RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD,
RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD,
RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD, RETARD!"

Then I thought it would be more appropriate to write:

"RETARDED, RETARDED, RETARDED, RETARDED, RETARDED, RETARDED, RETARDED, RETARDED, RETARDED, RETARDED,RETARDED,RETARDED, RETARDED,RETARDED, RETARDED, RETARDED, RETARDED, RETARDED, RETARDED,RETARDED, RETARDED, RETARDED, RETARDED, RETARDED, RETARDED, RETARDED and so forth"

But this would have been fun only for me, and why should I be so selfish?

Yet, I thought it might retard the reader if I don't explain myself more clearly. Retardment of information like this is odious to good writers, so why risk it? Why should I be accused of being a retarder?

Now, I don't claim to be a writer writer per se. Certainly not on the caliber of a, say, William Saffire, for example.

I just like to write. I'm more on the order of a junk-food snack writer. Saffire is a gourmet meal. Still, I'd hate it if something were to retard me from this fine pleasure.

Someone might take retardatory actions against me and ban me from writing. I'd be aghast! I'd have to live with this retardment and that would make me quite grumpy.

Still, when you think about it, there are many things that retard writing that don't involve punishment. Writers block, for example. It clearly retards writing. Perhaps it is a condition of the brain similar to when a speaker forgets his or her thoughts when speaking.

There is some research on stage-fright, if I remember correctly. And I understand that stage-fright has something to do with the constriction of the blood vessels and juices not moving so well towards the brain.

The blood is, supposedly, retarded from moving through the vessels. Whoa, that's a scary thought.

Maybe that has something to do with the law of retarded motion, which is a Physics concept about velocity?

Geeze, this is getting real complicated.

Now I feel like a retar.....never mind.

Anyway, maybe democrats perpetually have stage-fright?

Could this retardation of needed blood to their brains be why they don't customarily think very well?

Is that why Obama uses a tele ~~tubby~~ prompter for most of his speeches?

Glenn Greenwald Gets Justice Alito Wrong

2010-02-01T14:31:00.000-08:00

Glenn Greenwald, a constitutional lawyer--who no longer practices-- writes at Salon magazine online.

He has an article about Justice Sam Alito's response to President Obama's comments at the State of the Union Speech. Obama suggested that the court recently erred in its decision about letting unions and corporations advertise during elections.

Alito openly disagreed with Obama's comments and shook his head a bit and mouthed some words. Most people believe he said "that's not true" or "not true".

Greenwald said it broke decorum.

Oh right. Like a subversive President running rough shod over the Constitution and the American people, and insulting the court before the world isn't breaking decorum.

What is Greenwald's problem?

Doesn't Greenwald know that decorum isn't of interest to barbarians like Obama? Obama lost any right to decorum. And anyone who supports Obama has no right to expect decorum.

Why not?

Because of change. We are changing. We are told change is coming. Change is our banner. Decorum falls before change. Change slays decorum. Change means that which was isn't.

Obama knows it.

Greenwald needs to gripe about Obama's nihilistic and barbaric change, not Alito's response to it.

http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/01/28alito/index.html

The American Military

2010-01-30T14:11:00.001-08:00

A wise King will not let his military grow too powerful. Americans would be wise to counsel their leaders to shrink America's military; there should be a moratorium on enlistments. The national guard should be returned to the states cover the borders.

The savings from this should be split between refreshing our armaments and giving money to senior citizens for health savings accounts so that medicare can be abolished. All government activity in the medical area should be discontinued (except for the VA).The federal government involvement in health care is the biggest cause of the national debt and it isn't even a Constitutional function of the federal government. The military is.

Government involvement in medical affairs is causing the prices to soar and it can only be stopped if government gets out of the business.

That would slash the budget.

America could wipe out its debt to the Chinese by selling oil harvested through shale deposits. She is the Saudi Arabia of shale oil. It should be done through a leasing programs with all proceeds to the government going towards paying off the Chinese loans and the debt. A moratorium on new government programs must be adhered to in order for this to work. Immigration must be stopped completely while we settle our new citizens and they learn to be Americans.

Get rid of the Federal Reserve.

All unconstitutional programs should be rolled over to the states for them to disassemble, reform, or retain as they so choose. When Americans find out how costly they are, they will can most of them--as they should.

Programs like medicaid, education, and the FDA should be rolled over to the states. The DHS, DEA, and ATF should be abolished. Congress can busy themselves with the transfer of powers back to the states for next 50 years. That way greedy power-hungry pigs like Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Chuck Schumer won't have to worry about the unemployment line.

This is the path to America's new century.

What's In It for Me?

2010-01-28T04:47:00.000-08:00

"What's in it for me?"

That is the vile, smarmy, and insulting greed-based question with which president Barack Hussein Obama characterized the American people in his first State of the Union address.

This must be the first State of Union Address in which a president of the United States presumed his citizens are criminally-minded morons like him.

I guess when you've had everything handed to you on a silver platter, like president Obama has, this becomes your opinion of those eating off paper plates.

Perhaps if you grow up expecting everyone else owes you unmerited things, and you get them, you wind up thinking everyone else assumes the same greedy ideas as you.

Obama views Americans--me--as someone who is greedy as he is. If he didn't he wouldn't have said that there should be something "in it for me" with government handouts.

If anything, what would be "in it for me" I already possess. There is nothing else Obama can offer unless he thinks he is God (I don't think he is THAT psychopathic). All that I need from government is already mine as it is unalieanable.

All that Obama needs to do is protect that which pre-existed his unfortunate birth--my unalienable rights and the Constitution.

All that I need from government or Obama is to provide me with the keys to my success and even my health: that means follow the Constitution and get the hell out of my life.

It appears that Obama thinks I think the government is like Santa Claus. All I need to do is get on Santa Government's list and not be naughty. All I have to do is make wishes and things magically appear in brightly-wrapped gifts under my tree.

Or perhaps it's more like the Tooth Fairy model. I put a tooth, an arm, or my rights under my pillow at night and the Obama Fairy will leave me what's "in it for me".

President Obama and His Excuses

2010-01-22T06:09:00.000-08:00

It is unbecoming for a King (or a president) to give excuses for his or her failures.

President Obama of the United States blames his current problems (getting sacked in the Massachusetts election and risking the health care heist) on being so intently focused on the problems before him.

Now we get excuses as to why he has put the whole nation in peril: he has been too busy doing other things--doing things he has no constitutional authority to do (like butting his nose in our medical care business).

Well, isn't that nice.

Obama told the American people and the world that he was ready to work, ready to do the job of the American people.

I guess he is allowed his delusions.

But just about everyone on the other side of the political aisle knew he didn't have enough experience to do the job. It was obvious to all rational people.

And I knew something else: the man is dumb as dirt or at LEAST as stupid as George Bush.

Thanks Be To Obama, The Democrats, And Their Supporters

2010-01-21T10:17:00.000-08:00

I, Princess Isaidso, am so grateful for the Democratic Party of the United States and their supporters among the public and in the media.

If it wasn't for their deceitful, hateful, despicable, underhanded, loathsome, Marxist, fascist, and totalitarian conduct, the American public wouldn't be scared-straight.

The Fun of Surprise

2010-01-20T07:46:00.000-08:00

Princess Isaidso loves to laugh and be happy. And surprises can be very fun, especially for adults. Adults experience too many realities to be overly surprised about anything in life and so when a true surprise comes along, it is truly enjoyable.

So, I must say that I am very delighted that the people of the state of Massachusetts have seen to it that the democrat Martha Coakley lost her bid for the US senate seat.

I, therefore, proclaim gratefulness throughout the land.

Her Royal Highness,

Princess Isaidso

Haiti: The Kind of Country People Like Barack Obama Create

2010-01-13T15:39:00.000-08:00

The pitiful and pathetic country of Haiti is a land built by people like Barack Hussein Obama and the Democratic Party. It is a land of corrupt officials with no morals.

If you want to know what America will look like if it keeps putting men and women like Obama in power, watch Haiti.

Democrats will be happy when they live in the dirt and rubble of their civilization.

Al Gore Isn't Using The Furnace, Is He?

2010-01-07T22:13:00.000-08:00

Maybe Al Gore has enough blubber to insulate himself from the arctic blasts that are now reaching far into Florida for the past week in record breaking lows?

King Tut Obama

2010-01-06T08:00:00.000-08:00

According to Answer online to "tut" is defined:

"( t tŭt'tŭt')
intr.v., -tut·ted, -tut·ting, -tuts.
To express annoyance, impatience, or mild reproof: "those fussy fellows at the State Department tut-tutting about lack of reform in the political system" (John Hughes). "

Barack Hussein Obama is an expert tutter. He is king of tutting, I call him King Tut Obama.

He tutted yesterday.

Lunatics on the left were famous over the past thirty years or so for demanding toleration, mostly of their perversion, corruption, thievery, and sexual debaucheries. You don't hear them talk about toleration much anymore since the advent of the internet has allowed civic debate to clear up the matter of toleration and how the left misused the concept in order to justify their criminal and perverted nature while they demonized others.

Of course, Christians were usually the ones accused by the left of being intolerant until it was pointed out that their attack on Christians for intolerance was to admit being intolerant of Christians. And so the perverts and criminals on the left have given up misusing the word.

Enter King Tut Obama. He resurrected the word this week while back-handing government officials who sat on intell of the stupid, Muslim, Christmas-day bomber.

He tut-tutted government workers, but the incompetence lays at his feet for letting Muslims into the country in the first place when the WHOLE problem with terrorist in America is because the government lets Muslims come in.

Please never let the name Hussein, the president's middle name, escape your attention when we are discussing idiotic Muslims who want to murder innocent people.

Everyone is supposed to adhere to proper procedure but King Tut Obama.

Intel officers are supposed to flawlessly follow procedure for dot connecting, while Americans are to tolerate King Tut Obama usurping his powers, subverting their government, and destroy liberty.

King Tut Obama is perfect and without fault.

King Tut Obama can lie, repeatedly, whether about bringing troops home or whether the health-care hearings will be on TV. It doesn't matter:

King Tut Obama lies and lies well.

Tut-tut-tut.

King Tut Obama lies better than a rug or even a common criminal.

King Tut Obama lies like a Muslim who promises to commit no crimes while visiting America, then blows things up anyway.

God will have his way with King Tut Obama who says he believes in my God. It is written:

These six [things] doth the LORD hate: yea, seven [are] an abomination unto him:
A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,
An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief,
A false witness [that] speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren. Proverb 6:16-19

King Tut Obama is always with a proud look , has a lying tongue, and hands that have shed innocent blood. He has a heart that "deviseth" wicked imaginations: he is usurping the Constitution, subverting a government, and plundering the wealth of the American people.

King Tut Obama's feet could not be swifter, swiftness is key to his overthrow of the Constitution.

And Americans have never been more discordant.

http://www.answers.com/topic/tut-tut

The Sad Loss of CIA Agents Over the Holiday Season

2010-01-05T09:30:00.000-08:00

It is with great sadness that I write this post. Seven Americans (and five Canadians) lost their lives in Afghanistan just before the New Year holiday.(as reported in the Christian Science Monitor)

It is tragic because it was so unnecessary. We do not belong in the Middle-East and to send our best and brightest to their demise is so sad.

These lands are not our territories that we should be there defending anyone. We don't need so much intell about what goes on in them such that it risks people lives on this scale.

We only need to keep foreign Muslims out of America, not launch an economy destroying world war against a few thousand psychopaths.

When we get out of the Middle-East, the terrorism against us will die down.

This is not rocket science, it is human nature.

May God comfort the families of those who lost their lives.

May God give us the wisdom to mind our own business in this world He created.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Military/2009/1231/CIA-agents-killed-in-Afghanistan-were-in-Taliban-s-backyard

Merry Christmas To All

2009-12-25T06:21:00.000-08:00

For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.

Isaiah 9:6 KJV

Obama: As Deluded as Hitler

2009-12-21T01:51:00.000-08:00

I'm am convinced that among the greatest delusions is self-delusion. Perhaps it is more accurate to say that it is the worst of delusions. You judge. Barack Hussein Obama has recently demonstrated how this works.

He has given himself a B+ grade, so far, for his job as president of the United States.

In an age of grade inflation where students get good grades just for showing up to class, or having good intentions; and when leaders get Nobel Peace Prizes for doing, seemingly, little but remembering to bathe daily, patting yourself on the back for nothing makes all the sense in the world.

So when such a man, alleged to be brilliant and deemed competent to teach the Constitution at the highest levels to our brightest minds in a most distinguished and coveted university setting, becomes president and does so much to destroy the Constitution, you ought to believe that serious--SERIOUS--self-delusion is going on.

Who really believes that Stalin, Mao, Marx, Hitler, and even George Bush thought they were bad people? Didn't they wake up each day and basically give themselves a B+ or better?

I think so.

I think this is one of the biggest problems regarding the nature of evil. Those who commit it generally think they are the cats pajamas.(Urbandictionary)

Obama is sure he is right.

Hitler probably felt the same way about himself.

Robespierre might have as well.

Hugo Chavez, Mahmoud Amadinejad, Osama bin Laden and many more evil people now and throughout history do what they do or did because they are sure they are right. But they, unlike us wee folk (and imaginary Princesses) without the means to do so if we are self-deluded, have no power to break civilizations and cause widespread suffering.

There is no true righteousness outside the God of the Bible and the Lord Jesus Christ his son. Without Him no country is safe. Obama and Bush are classic examples of that fraudulent species of people who claim to be Christians but are not.

They are liars, as least to themselves.

The bible says of them, that they have

"... a form of godliness, but [deny] the power thereof..."*

They deny God by their every conduct.

*2 Timothy 3:5

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cats+pajamas

Harry Reid: The Ideal Democrat "Man"

2009-12-16T00:26:00.000-08:00

Most of us might know dainty, feminine women more manly than Senator Harry Reid. Quite a few of us probably know many five year old's smarter than him. And I would reckon that some of us have probably heard about gang-bangers with more morals than Harry Reid.

No wonder democrat women must insist on abortion, one look at him and they may feel the need not to reproduce.

Royal corrections and revisions to Her Majesty's blog posts occur frequently. She is honored by your patience.

Happy Thanksgiving to All

2009-11-26T05:01:00.000-08:00

Psalm 100

Make a joyful noise unto the LORD, all ye lands.

Serve the LORD with gladness: come before his presence with singing.

Know ye that the LORD he is God: it is he that hath made us, and not we ourselves; we are his people, and the sheep of his pasture.

Enter into his gates with thanksgiving; and into his courts with praise: be thankful unto him, and bless his name.

For the LORD is good; his mercy is everlasting; and his truth endureth to all generations.
.

Dictator-For-Another-Day Barack Hussein Obama

2009-11-05T16:55:00.000-08:00

The president of the United States was ruthlessly callous in his first official response of the murders of his soldiers at Fort Hood.

Royal corrections and revisions to Her Majesty's blog posts occur frequently. She is honored by your patience.

Whores?

2009-10-28T08:00:00.000-07:00

Can we all play Congressman and socialist whore Alan Grayson's game?

I might have an answer to that after I do my list:

Nancy Pelosi: Socialist whore
Harry Reid: Socialist whore (I'm for equality of the sexes)
Barack Hussein Obama: Communist whore
Anita Dunn: Communist whore (I mean REALLY)
Arianna Huffington: Marxist Whore (not sure if she is a communist or socialist)
George Soros: Communist whore
Hillary Clinton: Socialist whore

Ooops! I just realized that Congressman Grayson has issued an apology for calling a Federal Reserve adviser a whore.

I offer my sincerest apology for calling people whores.

Royal corrections and revisions to Her Majesty's blog posts occur frequently. She is honored by your patience.

Update on Cloth Shopping Bags, Old Bags, H1N1, Disease, and Pestilence

2009-10-26T05:33:00.000-07:00

Old bags in America are obsessed with cloth shopping bags. Apparently, there is nothing like atonement and redemption for their sins of gambling, frivolous living, and boozing it up than recycling and using cloth grocery bags.

Of course, retailers jumped on this one real quick because they could continue to charge everyone for plastic shopping bags while they no longer had to offer them to the goody-two shoe types. At least at Whole Foods they deduct the cost of a bag from your bill. But the bag bonanza by the grocers won't last for too long because now they need to provide wipes for the gray-haired menace.

Those little-grayed headed numb-skulls think they know best and they are now demanding wipes at local markets, grocery stores, and Wal-Marts. It's the germs and bacteria, you know. They don't like them and want to wipe them off their carts. Seems it never dawned on them to bring their own wipes. But these are mostly the Marxist types on the left who insist that government meet their every need, cradle to grave, so what can you expect?

All those slobbering children in the carts must drive them bonkers too, it's a old lady's microscopic nightmare! Drats! They should have been aborted!

These trouble-makers (not the bugs, bacteria, or babies) still haven't figured out that if plastic shopping bags are outlawed, their microbe problems have just begun. Next they will want the stores to provide disposable haz-mat suits to every shopper, just to keep her all prissy and clean.

Every person who gets contaminated at the local grocery store disease vector will have some gray-haired old bag to thank.

Then they can thank the crazy tree-huggers. Better yet, just sneeze on them and ask for a tissue.

Okay, that's not nice. If you are wearing short sleeves, just grab their shirt sleeve and sneeze in it. Thank them profusely and tell them how grateful you are to have saved a tree.

UPDATE: Wipes provided by grocers are less and less available. Seems they are still stuck with providing bags and with the H1N1 scare, wipes seem to be disappearing more quickly than ever.

Royal corrections and revisions to Her Majesty's blog posts occur frequently. She is honored by your patience.

Fox News and Our Dictator-For-Another-Day Obama

2009-10-21T07:16:00.000-07:00

Democrats seem to feel that they are in charge of the world's dictionaries and they feel they have the right to appoint themselves this job.

The Obama Administration is forcefully exercising this self-appointed right. The Southern Poverty Law Center is experts at this too, by-the-way.

But I am Princess Isaidso of Isaidsoland and there is no one more powerful on earth than I for i-said-so-ness.

Democrats have declared that:

A news organization is what democrats say it is.

A hater is only what democrats say he or she is.

A racist is only what democrats say he or she is.

A human life is only what democrats say he or she is.

And the Constitution means only what democrats say it means.

But I am Princess Isaidso! (raising scepter) And I have the ultimate right to define words.

And I declare that all democrats are deranged, demented, and insane people. (lowering scepter).

Why?

Because, I said so.

Newsless Fox News? That's News To Me!

2009-10-21T02:37:00.000-07:00

Fox News is not really a news station, according to Obama administration officials who are not really leaders or statesmen (Politico).

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/28417.html

Royal corrections and revisions to Her Majesty's blog posts occur frequently. She is honored by your patience.

How the Founding Fathers of America Threw Off Tyrants

2009-10-19T11:54:00.000-07:00

I Princess Isaidso, being a loving and benevolent monarch, find it difficult to imagine that the good people of Isaidsoland would revolt and overthrow my crown.

But I can understand that the American people would want to throw off the tyrants in the Federal government of the United States who have usurped their powers, are plundering the peoples' wealth, attempting to destroy liberty, and are quickly becoming a despotism which views lovers of America and the Constitution as the enemy to subjugate or destroy.

And so I would like to encourage the people of America to resist the Marxist tyrants in the Democratic Party lead by their Dictator For Another Day Barack Hussein Obama. And I would also like to remind them about a most important feature about how the Founding Fathers threw off their tyrants, the British.

That revolution--a quest for independence and liberty-- was instigated by the leadership of the colonies. It did not bubble up from the common man. It was the lower magistrates (the leaders) who saw that they were being denied their Rights Of Englishmen by the UPPER magistrates over in England.

These leaders (the lower magistrates), seeing that the British had failed to hold up their end of the agreement between the Crown and the colonialists, knew that the laws that bind the two--the Monarchy and the Colonists--were no longer in effect because the Crown had tossed those laws overboard. The colonialists were no longer obligated to OBEY the Crown since the Crown had violated it powers.

This is also how the law works between modern nations. After one signatory has violated a treaty or unilaterally changed the substance of the agreement, the other signatories are no longer bound by the agreement.

Seeing that the Crown was no longer bound by the agreement between the Crown and its people, the leading colonialists sounded the alarm TO the commoners that they were no longer under of the protection of their government, but in fact became a prey of it.

If there is a revolt in America against the usurpers in the Democratic Party or any other usurpatious political party including the Republicans, it should, like with our Founders, be led from the top. And so that brings me to Oath Keepers(Hat-tip Lew Rockwell)[1]. It is an organization that claims to be devoted to upholding the Constitution. And who am I to doubt them any more than Barack Obama who swore to uphold the Constitution and yet tramples it? It must outrage the Obama White House, the Department of Homeland Security, and the leadership of the Democratic Party when Americans are loyal to the Constitution. We know this because Democrats are regularly and contemptuously always violating the Constitution.

If swearing to upholding the Constitution makes one the enemy of the despots in Washington then the agreement between the people and their government has already been voided BY the government. There is no longer then, any consent of the governed.

It is a deal breaker.

The next stage in this theory is enslavement or rebellion. Obama is already trying to prevent any rebellion while trying to conduct the enslavement as quickly as possible. I don't have a crystal ball and don't know how this will work out, but the people of America have never been in such peril.

Do we see lower magistrates or leadership rising to stand up for the rights they know their government has no authority to steal from them? And I don't know, but we have probably never been so close to it. And I hardly know anything about Oath Keepers, but what they are doing is unique. Read about their rational sounding oath here. [2]

I have just learned that the Southern Poverty Law Center is against Oath Keepers [3]. For me, that can only mean that Oath Keepers are probably the good guys. The SPLC is a "hate-group" that was once virtuous, but has now become a predatory organization which persecutes conservative people and organizations. If that isn't bad enough, they are closely allied with law enforcement and helps them turn the hearts of our protectors against us.

Oath Keepers is, according to their website, run by loyal Americans who have served at various levels in the government of the United States. They proclaim support for the Constitution. Some are former soldiers and some are former law enforcement officers. One of their goals is to get military personnel and lawmen to swear an oath to not disarm law-abiding citizens, which is a violation of the Constitution. Of course we know that abolishing the 2nd Amendment, or if that doesn't work, making the 2nd Amendment useless, is one important step along the way to the dearly desired goal of the totalitarians in the Democratic Party to abolish the Constitution and subjugate the American people.

The Oath Keepers say they will not obey immoral or un-Constitutional orders. No wonder the SPLC is smearing them as white supremacists! When you are devoted to the Constitution, the leftists think you are evil!

Marxists don't like Americans being devoted to the Constitution, and openly swearing to uphold it really riles them up.

I understand that in some places in America, VOTERS swear to uphold the Constitution when they sign their voter registration forms. Few know that they swear to do this and how SERIOUS a matter it is. Most who swear to uphold the Constitution do not realize that they are violating that oath continually by not demanding their leaders to stop their usurpations.

May all Americans swear to uphold the Constitution and jealously protect it, and those who continue to trample it (both parties do it, Democrats more) brought to ruin by derision.

Americans who resist the Marxist Democrats don't want the government of the United States destroyed, they want it RESTORED. Those who are destroying the government are Obama and his Marxist thugs in government and that is why the DHS, the SPLC and Obama portray lovers of America as evil.

[1]
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/040388.html

[2]
http://oath-keepers.blogspot.com/

[3]
http://www.lvrj.com/news/oath-keepers-pledges-to-prevent-dictatorship-in-united-

Edict of Spiders, Critters, and Varmints

2009-10-17T06:35:00.000-07:00

I Princess Isaidso do hereby proclaim, on this seventeenth day of October in the Year of Our Lord two thousand and nine, that whilst I address the good people of Isaidsoland or dignitaries from around the world (or wherever I may be) no creepy crawly bugs, spiders, critters, or varments shall be allowed to travel upon my person without my acknowledgement.

All gallant men attending nearby shall be informed of and trained to execute the official royal procedures for approaching my person in hasty fashion to remove said creatures.

1. It shall be that the code words "Noah's Ark" shall be shouted out clearly within the hearing of the Princess.

2. All attendants shall quickly and without commotion descend upon the vicinity of the Princess to find the mislocated creature and remove it with all do haste and gentleness towards the Princess and the creature. There shall always be an attendent with a sack in which the creatue might be put into and removed from the vicinity.

3. If the life of the creature may be spared, it shall be released into its proper habitat after it has been sent about the Princessdom for exhibition to all the dear children of Isaidsoland so they may admire what a strange and glorious creature our Lord has created and visited upon their Princess.

This Edict shall be excecuted from this day forward.

King Obama: A Very Bad King Indeed

2009-10-15T06:30:00.000-07:00

Barack Hussein Obama is a deceitful leader. The Bible says in Matthew 6:26:

"But if thine eye be evil, thy whole body shall be full of darkness. If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness!"

Obama's eye is very dark indeed. And he is not a Bible believing Christian, it is impossible. No one can be a Christian and a member of the blood-thirsty, perverse, and diabolical Democratic Party.

He continually uses words to deceive the American people. Salem Radio Network is reporting that the Dictator For Another Day (my terms), Barack Hussein Obama, has now spoken about "jobs". Reuters has the story here.

He absurdly says he "...will explore each and every avenue that I can think of that will lead to job creation and economic growth."

Did America hire an explorer?

Or did they hire a man who said he was ready to lead?

If Obama was ready to lead how is it that he needs to go exploring? Did he lie to the people when he said he was ready to be president?

We already know what will help Americans find jobs: sound monetary policy (not Keynesian economics), limited Federal power, slashing spending, fair taxation, and freeing up businesses from brutally oppressive laws. There is no need to explore anything unless you are a fool or a liar.

There is nothing to explore unless you are trying to avoid doing the right thing.

A real man, a real leader, a real Christian would not deceive his people by slick statements about exploring unlimited avenues when the sure path to success is already found.

A real man, a real leader, a real Christian would tell his desperate citizens who are suffering: I will DO whatever it takes within my power to make the job market thrive.

Obama didn't tell Americans that he would do whatever it takes to increase the job market in America. He only told them that he was looking into it.

That is not a manly response. It is not the response of a Godly man. It is the response of deceitful, ruthless, monster who doesn't care about the suffering of others and will not use his authorized powers to stop it.

Dictator For Another Day Obama needs Americans to suffer from unemployment so they become dependent on the crumbs he and the evil Democrats pass out to them.

He needs them enslaved to his Marxist vision.

http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNewsAndPR/idUSN1423845820091014

The Stalinist Rise In America. Which Side is the CIA on?

2009-10-13T15:59:00.000-07:00

Princess Isaidso is sad to see the Democratic Party of America revive Stalinism. Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Barack Hussein Obama have become Stalinists. And her heart goes out to Americans as they face the coming persecutions by the these deranged democrats and their fellow travellers throughout the country.

From the neo-Stalinist kangaroo style court persecutions of businessmen and women before members of congress, the seizure of private industries, the attempt to shut down opposition media, the attempt to circumvent the second amendment, to rewarding members of the democratic party (think communist party members) with political plunder, the danger grows.

May God help America in this, its darkest hour.

Barack Hussein Obama and His Peace Prize

2009-10-09T16:07:00.000-07:00

Does the Nobel Committee have an Affirmative Action program too?

Royal corrections and revisions occur frequently. Princess Isaidso is honored by your patience.
.

Barack Hussein Obama is "Deeply Humbled" Winning the Nobel Peace Prize

2009-10-09T08:17:00.000-07:00

No one in their right mind believes this.

Royal corrections and revisions occur frequently. Princess Isaidso is honored by your patience.
.

By Tom Friedman's Own Reasoning, Leftists are Going to Murder Conservatives

2009-10-01T01:56:00.001-07:00

Leftists do often make the mistake of doing that thing which they condemn in right- wingers.

For example. The left wants to criminalize hate thoughts and speech, but by their own standard and reasoning they are guilty of the same kinds of thoughts and speech (or worse) they accuse the right of. Just look at how they treat Sarah Palin. When republicans treat democrats like the left treats Sarah it is called hate, but when democrats do it to republicans it never is. Leftists have accused people like Rush Limbaugh of "hate radio" for years.

Another example is seen in Bette Midler's recent statements. She accuses Glenn Beck of hate (and worse) but doesn't think her accusations should be considered hate (or worse). She says:

"If you look around at the rest of the world and what this kind of behavior has done, like in Rwanda, where the demagogues got on the radio and fomented all that hate between the Tutsis and the Hutus and the devastation that happened from that, I mean, it's terrifying..." (Newsbusters online)

Well, isn't Ms. Midler being hateful and demagogic in her statements and thus prepping the left to commit crimes on the order of Rwandan crimes? According to her own reasoning and standards, yes. Of course, Ms. Midler is completely off her rocker. She and Beck are not laying a foundation for a Rwandan slaughter.

Tom Friedman did another of these unconscious, leftist, self-accusations (New York Times online). He says that right-wingers are speaking in a way that will lead to the assassination of Barack Hussein Obama. Apparently, we cannot tell the truth about Obama's Marxism because some crazies will try to assassinate him. Friedman is thus suggesting that there is nothing seriously wrong with Obama, when according to a good many people there clearly are many serious things wrong with him.

I wonder how Friedman felt about the conduct of the left before the REAL assassination attempt on Ronald Reagan?

I wonder if Friedman was worried that George Bush needed a security detail because of the mad characters on the left who wanted him dead?

I wonder who Friedman blames for the loon who shot the anti-abortion protester a couple of weeks ago? Right-wingers?

Who bit off the finger of the anti-Obama-care protester? A right-winger?

Who wants to murder Glenn Beck and his family? Right-wingers?

Who, in anger, bullying, and intimidation threatened to reveal the addresses of AIG employees and terrified their families? Right-wingers or the leftist Barney Frank?

Tom Friedman isn't just condemning a few crazies on both sides who take things into their own hands, he is claiming that dissenters are creating an environment for assassination.

Wouldn't Tom be surprised to learn if a leftist put that poll up to harm the president specifically to make the right look bad? Wouldn't he be more surprised to learn if the CIA or FBI did it?

By his own standard then (the standard that vociferous criticism leads to murder), Tom Friedman's vociferous criticism of conservatives creates an environment for leftists to murder conservatives.

As far as America no longer being a united people, we only have leftists like Friedman to thank. This started in earnest in the 1960s when the left became the counter-culture. That counter-culture and its offspring is now in power. Those who disagree with the left are the people trying to preserve the traditional culture. Tom and those like him are trying to destroy it and then they complain because some people (those on the right) won't agree to it.

If Friedman would like to unite the country, he will become a conservative ( but not a neo-con) and uphold our Judeo-Christian traditions and the Constitution. He won't do this because he is perpetuating the disunity the counter-culture promotes while at the same time complains about the disunity HE causes but blames on others.

It is like how the left complains about hate and are hateful, and how they complain about an environment for murder while they create one themselves.

It's called hypocrisy whether based in fact or fantasy.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jeff-poor/2009/09/30/bette-midler-warns-glenn-beck-could-set-rwanda-civil-war-u-s

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/30/opinion/30friedman.html?_r=3
.

Royal corrections and revisions occur frequently. Princess Isaidso is honored by your patience.
.

CNN, Racism, and the Leftists

2009-09-27T16:10:00.000-07:00

CNN just did a segment before the seven o'clock hour (eastern time) about Jimmy Carter's charge of racism against Obama's protesting critics.

On the panel was a pasty white guy and a bi-racial man--who admitted to being a former Marxist radical.

The host appeared bi-racial as well.

What was revealing about the discussion was how the pasty-white, leftist-leaning guy hardly let the bi-racial guy speak about blacks and racism.

The white guy rudely monopolized the discussion and the bi-racial guy was unable to represent an alternative bi-racial or black attitude.

The white guy was condemning whites for racism WHILE the white guy wouldn't let the bi-racial man equal time to comment about it!

If there was racism anywhere, it appeared to be the white guy acting like whites can better address the issue of racism than blacks or bi-racial people.

There is a attitude among white leftists that implies that blacks and bi-racials are too stupid to speak for themselves. We see this when democrats mock republicans for having too few blacks and Hispanics in the GOP. This mockery presumes blacks and Hispanics are too stupid to choose the political philosophy they prefer.

White leftists don't see their own bigotry or racist attitudes.

Royal corrections and revisions occur frequently. Princess Isaidso is honored by your patience.
.

Obama Cat is Away; Bill Clinton Mouse Will Play

2009-09-26T15:06:00.001-07:00

Barack Hussein Obama is busy with foreign affairs this week (a U.N. assembly and a meeting of the G20 in Pittsburg) and who do we see all over CNN besides Ahmadinejad?

Bill Clinton.

He's everywhere this week. Even on Fox News.

Is this a signal from the left-wing media that their hope and change is a disaster? Is it a signal from the Clintons that Obama is dissing Mrs. Clinton's authority as Secreatary of State?

Royal corrections and revisions occur frequently. Princess Isaidso is honored by your patience.
.

Princess Prediction Number 2

2009-09-20T13:32:00.000-07:00

OBMAMA NEEDS A FAMINE

But even a fear of it will do.

Marxists always use famine to control populations. Barack Hussein Obama, being a Marxist, will not hesitate to use this tool.

We already have evidence that the foundation for famine (or the fear of it) is being laid.

The first evidence is the police-state mentality Obama and the democrats are whooping up about junk food. When they punish citizens for consuming them (through taxation or denial of health care services) this will cause chaos in the food supply. They will destabilize it with a sudden rush for more wholesome foods which farmers have not planned nor planted for. There might food lines for government hand-outs bought from foreign countries (if foreigners will take our devalued dollars).

The penalties for consuming junk food will cause shortages in wholesome foods (a delightful prospect for all self-respecting Marxists). The panic will give the democrats an excuse to seize the food supply. More shortages will result. Then more fear. And more chaos. Perfect! That is just what Obama wants.

He can then implement more ungodly and un-Constitutional programs because of the chaos he intentionally creates or takes advantage of. You ask me how I know? I know because Obama is a Marxist and this is what Marxists do. In other words, bears do poo-poo in the woods.

Another slab of foundation being laid for government sponsored famine or fear of famine is happening in California as I write. The farmers in the San Joaquin valley are out of water, for whatever reason. Nearby them is water they could use. I'm not going to get into the middle of that particular mess but I do understand the leftist environmentalists are playing a role in this situation. There is a little minnow type fish involved as well (I don't know if they are democrats, but maybe Cass Sunstein knows).

Even though I agree that it is stupid to farm on the desert land in the valley, it is more stupid to suddenly cut off the waters from farmers.. That could destabilize the food supply, much to the delight of Obama and democrats who, being the good Marxists they are, look for opportunities to implement their Socialist and Communist schemes whenever tragedy is upon us.

This may hurt hungry people overseas as well. But, no matter, there are eggs to crack (as totalitarians are fond of saying) !

Royal Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.
.

Princess Isaidso and Her Royal Epiphany About Racism

2009-09-16T13:12:00.000-07:00

It just came to me!

The reason democrats loathed, despised, and mercilessly hounded George Bush is because Bush is a WHITE man.

Why do I know this? (outside of my right to claim that I said so?)

I know this because the Democratic Party has more non-whites in it than in the Republican Party, and by democrats own standards and methods of reasoning, vigorous dissent equals racism. (royal wink)

Princess Isaidso gets so very excited about these royal revelations that suddenly pop into her lovely head so gloriously framed under her glittering crown.

You are now dismissed. And thank you for your kind attention.

Royal corrections and revisions occur frequently. Princess Isaidso is honored by your patience.
.

Obama Says He is a Capitalist?

2009-09-15T04:11:00.000-07:00

I thought I heard that on the radio last night during a toss or turn under my cozy royal blankets.

Perhaps President Barack Hussein Obama thinks Princess Isaidso believes words count more than actions?

A capitalist does not behave like President Obama.

EVER.

Royal corrections and revisions to Her Majesty's blog posts occur frequently. She is honored by your patience.

Meditations From Edmund Burke Highly Applicable Barack Hussein Obama

2009-09-06T20:32:00.000-07:00

As many Americans begin to recognize that they bought a pig in a poke when they voted for Barack Hussein Obama (may God bless him nonetheless), lovers of America--which don't include Obama, Rahm Emanuel, and Nancy Pelsoi-- need to keep the heat turned up on them.

We can do this by informing ourselves, educating ourselves, and fighting for our right to dissent and free speech. And we must demand a free internet and continued access to the media driven by the marketplace.

In my recent readings of Edmund Burke, I ran across several statements that seem to define Obama perfectly.

All selections are from Reflections on the Revolution in France, edited by L.G. Mitchell, Oxford University Press, paperback, 1993.

About Obama and his colleagues' ruthless and callous drive to destroy America as we know it:

"In these gentlemen there is nothing of the tender parental solicitude which fears to cut up the infant for the sake of an experiment. In the vastness of their promises, and the confidence of their predictions, they far out do all the boasting of empirics [sic]. The arrogance of their pretensions, in a manner provokes, and challenges us to an enquiry [sic] into their foundation." (167)

That foundation is Marxism, of course.

About Obama's speech-making skills:

"...eloquence may exist without a proportional degree of wisdom." (167)

About Obama's Intellectual Inferiority:

It is this inability to wrestle with difficulty which has obliged...[Obama]...to commence [his] schemes of reform with abolition and destruction. (168)

Instead of reforming with prudent, wise, and modest "tweaking", Obama and friends wildly overturn, abolish and destroy.

Royal corrections and revisions to Her Majesty's blog posts occur frequently. She is honored by your patience.
.

Oh How Embarrassing

2009-08-29T07:03:00.000-07:00

You have to really be off your rocker to be proud of your ethnic influence in wicked Hollywood which has flung putrefying filth from one end of the planet to the other right on through the solar system and beyond (David Kramer at Lew Rockwell). I understand these filthy images will continue to travel through the universe for as long as it exists.

If there really were space aliens, I might be on their side if they wanted to bomb the planet to smithereens for polluting galactic air-space with our Hollywood trash.

And I imagine that even Jehovah has to filter out all the filth that has come streaming His way towards the Seventh Heaven. I reckon that He is keeping a record of it too and will name names eventually. And you thought Santa had some list.

It seems that Mr. Kramer isn't a Jew by faith and I'm not saying that Kramer is responsible for any of Hollywood's garbage, I'm just saying it is kind of nutty to take credit for it.

In my opinion, Hollywood does not have such a distinguished or honorable legacy that Jews should want to trumpet it. Hollywood is a stain on America's reputation. Even movies like E.T. couldn't be made free of the filthy talk that is inserted in movies meant to be seen by children.

If you have watched the development of Shrek series (clearly meant for kiddies) you will see that they get more and more crude, and the crudeness appears to be intentional. And I have no clue if the Jews had anything to do with that either. I'm just saying it is not wise to take credit for the whole industry.

Hollywood, it seems is, in the balance, a NET negative to humankind.

Americans get many of their corrupt views of government and way too many whacked-out views of history and morality from Hollywood.

And, besides, I liked Davey and Goliath. At least, what I remember of it.

Hmmph.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/034431.html
http://helios.gsfc.nasa.gov/qa_sp_en.html#radiosig

Royal corrections and revisions to Her Majesty's blog posts occur frequently. She is honored by your patience.
.

Princess Isaidso Doesn't Like Those Who Destroyed the French Monarchy

2009-08-17T10:37:00.000-07:00

The following post first appeared on our sister blog Criminally-Minded Behavior. As a Princess, I take to heart the overthrow of the Crown in France by the Jacobins long ago. And I feel that president Barack Hussein Obama of the United States is behaving very much like the revolutionaries in France. I'm sorry, but that led to terror, torture, and murder (and Napoleon!)

Here is the post:

Our president is, along with being a dedicated, dangerous, extremist, and subversive Marxist, also a Jacobin. I guess the two blend together well.

The Jacobins were evil little buggers who overthrew the French monarchy (with the approval of our own Thomas Jefferson). It was probably the worst idea Jefferson ever had because innocent people were tortured and murdered and France has never been the same since.

Edmund Burke, the great British statesman and philosopher and contemporary of Thomas Jefferson and Robespierre (leader of the Jacobins), had much to say about how the Jacobins behaved leading up to and implementing their terror against the French aristocracy and the citizens of France.

Their criminal actions have since been called "The Terror" (Wikipedia), so I'm not exaggerating here. And democrats don't have to get their big fat noses out of joint, because some time ago I referred to George Bush and his gang as Jacobins. All of this US Jacobinism can be traced to the dangerous, extremist, subversive Council on Foreign Relations--those pullers down of ancien (and not so ancien) regimes.

In his great book Reflections on the revolution in France 1790, (tradition says it is a letter to a young relative) Burke describes this horrifying part of history with such famous insight that people who are in the position to wield power have no excuse whatsoever for repeating that form of tyranny except that they condone it.

Mostly, our leaders are not very intelligent or wise and don't know what Burke said or what the Jacobins did (or else they DO know what Burke said and what the Jacobins did and want to repeat The Terror).

In the portions of text I quote below, Burke is referring to the confiscation of the property and wealth owned by the Church. The reader should replace, in their mind, the word "church" with the words "the rich" or "corporations".

All quotes are from Reflections on the Revolution in France, edited by L.G. Mitchell, published by Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-281844-0, paperback edition 1993.

Burke writes of the revolutionaries:

"They have, it seems, found out in the academics of the Palais Royale, and the Jacobins, that certain men had no right to the possessions which they held under law, usage, the decisions of courts, and the accumulated prescription of ...[many]... years." (pg 106).

Burke is referring to the property of the church in France which was lawfully acquired and owned. Just as the property (the money) of AIG employees was lawfully owned when the US government (the thieves in the Democratic Party and their lap-dogs in the mainstream media) tried to steal it from them through threats and intimidations.

There is an insidious notion, held mostly by leftists and democrats, that corporations are fictitious (and evil) entities invented by the state. This article by Robert Hessein summarizes their nutty kind of thinking. Hat-tip Lew Rockwell.

Corporations tend to drive leftists as nuts as the church drove Jacobins nuts, which probably explains why the response to these US corporations is so viciously similar to the Jacobins.

According to Burke, the Jacobins believed that:

"..the ecclesiastics [US corporations] are fictitious persons, creatures of the state; whom at pleasure they [Jacobins] may destroy, and of course limit and modify in every particular; that the goods they posses are not properly theirs, but belong to the state which created the fiction; and we are therefore not to trouble ourselves with what they may suffer in the natural feelings and natural persons, on account of what is done towards them in this their constructive character." (106)

Holy Reign of Terror Batman, that is exactly the kind of thinking we see in action against corporations with Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Ted Kennedy, and Obama. It is rampant in their party.

Burke then says of this sort of thinking that "The arguments of tyranny are as contemptible as its force is dreadful."

Indeed.

Burke writes that if the Jacobins are so concerned about impoverishment then there would be evidence of it. He says:

"If, as I said, any persons are to make good deficiencies to the public creditor, besides the public at large, they must be those who managed the agreement. Why therefore are not the estates of all the comptrollers general confiscated?" (114)

And I ask why isn't the money or wealth of Barney Frank (who told us Fanny Mae was sound) not confiscated? Why is Rush Limbaugh's money confiscated when he didn't advocate loaning money to unqualified buyers?

Burke says, "Why not [seize the estates and wealth from] those of the long succession of ministers, financiers, and bankers who have been enriched whilst the nation was impoverished by their dealings and their counsels? (114)

I say why isn't the estate and wealth of Timmy the tax cheat Geithner seized? He worked for the Federal Reserve and promotes the destructive polices of the Democratic Party which are bankrupting the nation.

Ted Kennedy has the longest record of destroying the economy and bringing in the illegal alien invaders who are crippling hospitals. Our current mess can be justly laid at his feet. Seize his estate and wealth if there is a need to punish someone who contributed to the mess.

How about seizing the wealth of Alan Greenspan? Why bother small businessmen when they are not responsible for the fiscal mismanagement by the Federal Reserve?

Burke continues:

"Why is not the estate of Mr. Laborde declared forfeited rather than of archbishop of Paris, who has had nothing to do in the creation or in the jobbing of the public funds?"

Nancy Pelosi wants to take from others to fund things the Federal Government has no authority to fund, but refuses to donate her wealth and estate to those in need of health care.

Why?

Because she is a dishonest and conniving as the day is long and doesn't want to give up her wealth when she can pick other peoples pockets to"share" the burden of her own warped and twisted guilt. It increases her political power to "steal from the rich and give to the poor" but costs her no extra monetary sacrifice than her peers (even those peers who don't support her thieving ways). Its win/win for Nancy and her colleagues. Everyone else pays a brutal price.

Burke writes about the knuckle-dragging mentality of those who plunder others and call it law. He says:

"Few barbarous conquerors have ever made so terrible a revolution in property. None of the heads of the Roman factions, when they established 'crudelem illam Hastam'* in all their auction of rapine, have ever set up to sale the goods of the conquered citizen to such an enormous amount."(115)

* http://www.ourcivilisation.com/burke/note/256.htm

In other words, not even barbaric invading conquerors are as evil as Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Barack Obama, and Robespierre.

Burke says that the Roman confiscators has SOME basis for their confiscations, they:

"..regarded [the conquered] as persons who had forfeited their property by their crimes. With you [the Jacobins] in your improved state [Burke is being sarcastic here] of the human mind, there was no such formality. You seized upon five millions sterling of annual rent, and turned forty or fifty thousand human creatures out of their houses, because 'such was your pleasure.'" (116)

How many Americans are losing everything because Democrats keep expanding their powers and need more money to fund it? How many young Americans not even old enough to read are being robbed in the future for democrat political gain today? How wicked is that? How barbaric?

Pelosi, Reid, Obama, and Emanuel make the Jacobins look like pikers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reign_of_Terror#The_Terror
http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Corporations.html

Royal corrections and revisions to Her Majesty's blog posts occur frequently. She is honored by your patience.

Cash for Cars in America: FREE MONEY IS POPULAR!

2009-08-06T14:32:00.000-07:00

Who would have guessed. Handing out free money (cash for cars) government steals from others is popular!!

Who knew!

Who knew!

Royal Corrections and Revisions to Her Majesty's blog posts occur frequently. She is honored by your patience.
.

Pricess Isaidso Is Outraged

2009-07-31T03:55:00.000-07:00

What has become of America? A scourge has covered the land. It is everywhere and there is no vaccination against it. No legal recourse. No means of fighting it.

What is this scourge?

Capri pants.

Those, I'm not too sure if I want to wear shorts or trousers pants.

Those silly looking pants that make shoes look sillier and women squattier.

They are everywhere and ubiquitous, and finding reasonably priced SUMMER trousers is made nearly impossible this summer because of this scourge.

With the economy so bad in America, it would be a sad thing to see retailers stuck with tens of millions of these ugly little items on their racks.

Royal corrections and revisions to Her Majesty's blog posts occur frequently. She is honored by your patience.
.

What is the US Department of Homeland Security Up To?

2009-07-16T05:32:00.001-07:00

The DHS has to be up to no good because such a usurpatious and dangerous organization, which will someday be the vehicle for what essentially will be an unconstitutional standing army, can never be trusted.

There is a reason why the DHS is going to tap into the E-Verify system for verifying the illegal invaders (the US government intentionally lets into the country) when making federal contracts. But why they are doing this it isn't clear yet.

Perhaps they just want people to stop calling them jackboot thugs and totalitarian monsters and this is throwing a bone to critics.

Or maybe they don't like being called extremist subversives (they are) and want to act like they don't support the white genocide in the United States.

Maybe the democrat rank and file is mad because the stinking-rotten illegals are stealing the jobs that the democrats want to steal from republicans and give to democrats and union members?

It is simply too hard to tell what goes on in the wicked little minds of democrats since, well, they are all so very wicked and evil.

Royal corrections and revisions to Her Majesty's blog posts occur frequently. She is honored by your patience.
.

Princess Prediction #1: Cripple the Internet

2009-07-13T17:22:00.000-07:00

I, Princess Isaidso, do not have a crystal ball. Nor do I read tea-leaves or animal entrails. But, I do possess the power of isaidsoness. And so, I will from time to time, use this power to make predictions.

My first prediction is precipitated by the announcement this week of computer threats to highly sensitive US government systems, allegedly from overseas. These systems are being hacked in to and the usual suspects are being virtually round-up: China and North Korea.

But I wouldn't look that far while the dangerous, radical, extremist subversives Barack Hussein Obama and Rahm Emanuel are running around Washington. The internet is a threat to them more than it is a threat to our enemies.

For a very long time the Marxist subversives (the Democratic Party) have controlled the major media outlets and the public schools in America. They have almost completely succeeded in subverting the nation some time ago. But they didn't plan on talk radio and the internet (nor cable TV). And that is causing them a good deal of grief and confusion. It is holding up the complete overthrow of the Constitution and subjugation of the American people.

That just won't do. This is why there are threats by the Marxists (the Democratic Party) for the re-establishment of the Fairness Doctrine in the state controlled media (as Rush Limbaugh calls it).

And this is why Obama and Rahm need the Internet crippled.

I predict that Americans-- subversive democrats--will cripple the Internet and the World Wide Web.

We don't need to worry about the North Koreans assaulting our liberties when Obama is in office to do a better job of it.

Royal corrections and revisions to Her Majesty's blog posts occur frequently. She is honored by your patience.

Don't Mourn for Perverts

2009-06-26T08:13:00.000-07:00

It is illegal in my Princessdom, to knowingly sit minors before adults who intentionally grab their privates in public (whether singing or not) on my Royal Stage and imitate the sex act. Such people may indeed be sent to the gallows along with the pervert.

Furthermore it is illegal to provide children with music and paraphernalia of such demented and depraved persons. These adults may be exiled to nations which condone perversion, countries like, say, America.

It is considered barbaric, savage, and more primitive than the dumbest animal to subject children to this sort of behavior and then call it entertainment or praiseworthy.

Only depraved people speak fondly of the dead Michael Jackson and get their children involved in the mourning process.

Royal corrections and revisions to Her Majesty's blog posts occur frequently. She is honored by your patience.

ALERT !!!!

2009-06-20T13:46:00.000-07:00

Deploy the castle guards! Guard the moat! (mine is clean, by the way) Archers to the ready! Danger is afoot!

I, Princess Isaidso, am now convinced that Libertarianism is anti-woman. There just isn't any indignity they are not willing for women to suffer if it saves a penny and gives them the right to rule the universe. I'm sorry, but anarchy is not comfy!

Read about the horror here, and make sure to click on the "Read the Rest of the Article" link at the bottom of the Lew Rockwell article for a photo of what Libertarians probably think beauty is (is that a massive goober* I spot to the right of her lips?) It figures.

The least she could have done, in the spirit of Libertarianism, I guess, is buy a bunch of broccoli and use that big rubber-band holding the spears together to tie up her hair. She probably could have used a sprig of broccoli to spruce up the hair-do (Pebbles Flintstone style).

If my subjects are disturbed with stripping the natural balance of the hair and scalp after shampooing, perhaps they can follow their shampoo step with a rinse of diluted apple cider vinegar and water (unless they are allergic to it, of course.), It would be just like the Libertarians to dispense with bathing altogether too. Who ARE these people???

HowStuffWorks online has some good advice about cider vinegar and hair, here. And, of course, I, Princess Isaidso, do not ask you to do this if you are allergic, or hostile, or paranoid, or disturbed, or CHEAP about using vinegar on your noggin. I expect all my subjects to be sensible. In fact, I command it! Call your doctor beforehand if you are not sure (rolling eyes).

*goober: fever blister

http://www.lewrockwell.com/spl/dont-wash-your-hair.html
http://pebblescleaningservice.com/images/a%20pebbles%20pic.jpg

Royal corrections and revisions to Her Majesty's blog posts occur frequently. She is honored by your patience.

Edict of Ma'am Boxer

2009-06-19T02:49:00.000-07:00

I, Princess Isaidso, on this 19 th day of June, in the year of our Lord 2009 (that means A.D.) do issue the Edict of Ma'am Boxer.

Hitherto, from this day forward (and until an apology is forthcoming) I command that all citizens of Isaidsoland shall refer to ALL female leaders (congressman, senators, city councilmen, etc) of the Democratic Party in the fifty United States of America as Ma'am. They shall not ever say "Senator So-And-So", or "Congresswoman Whatchamacallit". It shall always be Ma'am Knucklehead or Ma'am Loon, etc. For the sake of clarity, the following parenthetical usage is acceptable: Ma'am Nitwit (the democrat who is a senator from California) etc.

I, Princess Isaidso, ever sensitive of official titles, realize that Ms. Boxer's official title is given to her by her constituents with the reasonable expectation that she uses it responsibly and not stupidly BASH decent people over the head with it. Said title is guaranteed to Ma'am Boxer by fine soldiers (such as the one she recently, publicly and wickedly, insulted). Said soldier has vowed to lay down his life for said ungrateful kook Ma'am Boxer.

No citizen of this Princessdom shall honor any Democratic Party woman of the USA with the title of her office. This includes all official Isaidsoland documents.

Corrections and revisions refer to blog posts frequently. Thank you for you patience.
.

Edict of Plastic Shopping Bags

2009-06-10T03:37:00.000-07:00

Cloth Shopping Bags: Swine Flu Vector?*

I, Princess Isaidso, do issue the Edict of Plastic Shopping Bags.

To help prevent a killer flu pandemic this coming flu season, all subjects in the Princessdom of Isaidso shall have all groceries and products purchased at retail outlets placed in clean, new, sanitary, and never used before plastic bags.

Princess Isaidso is not in the business of following the lead of blue-haired old ladies who have nothing better in the world to do (other than playing bingo) than prove to everyone how morally superior they are to everyone else with their disease-infested reusable cloth grocery bags.

Princess Isaidso is not amused with these old ladies who are generally stupid enough to buy any idiotic line that comes down the pike from half-insane environmentalists who will get us all killed if they can help it.

Therefore, to reduce the chance of a flu pandemic in the magnificent Princessdom of Isaidsoland, under the penalty of law and punishment (probably involving dungeons, spiders, and dragons), reusable grocery bags are forthwith banned from her Royal Majesty's healthy and glorious Princessdom.

If the blue-head old bags are not careful, they will be banned too.

*Vector

http://www.medterms.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=5968

Royal corrections and revisions to Her Majesty's blog posts occur frequently. She is honored by your patience.
.

Democrats Have Not Learned, Mr. Wiesel

2009-06-07T14:19:00.000-07:00

The New York Daily News writes " Elie Wiesel said yesterday, 'The world hasn't learned.'" This was a reference to the heart-breaking tragedy at the Nazi era Buchenwald prison camp in Germany during WWII.

Yes, Mr. Wiesel, the world has not yet learned. Holocausts are still possible even in America, the land of abortion and late term abortion. Abortion (legal ones) occurs mainly because of democrats who are the only political party standing in the way of stopping it. That man you stood with at Buchenwald, Barack Hussein Obama, president of the United States of America, is a democrat. You should have looked him coldly in the eye when you made your statement.

It is good and right that one day all the powerful and evil men who got away with mass slaughter will get their comeuppance when they stand before the throne of God and receive judgment for their conduct, because the powerless often cannot stop these monsters. Can they Mr. Wiesel?

Rank and file democrats are insulted when you tell them that you wish they have been aborted.

Why is that? Why are they offended? What are they admitting by being offended? Are they admitting what they deny--that a human life is snuffed out? Why it is wrong for someone to wish on pro-choicers what they wish on others? (I really don't wish abortion on anyone, I only say it to make a point).

President Barack Hussein Obama said "To this day, there are those who insist that the Holocaust never happened - a denial of fact and truth that is baseless and ignorant and hateful..."

Obama should know a lot about denial.

http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/2009/06/06/2009-06-06_of_remembrance_and_war_president_obama_debunks_holocaust_deniers_in_buchenwald_s.html

Royal corrections and revisions to Her Majesty's blog posts occur frequently. She is honored by your patience.
.

Frank Schaeffer: Contributed to the Death of Private William Long?

2009-06-04T09:47:00.000-07:00

Frank Schaeffer is over at the creepy Huffington Post trying to absolve himself of his old sins (of advocating violence to end abortion), but seems to be setting himself up for new ones because he supports Barack Hussein Obama and the democrats.

He is repenting of having promoted murder to stop abortion. And isn't he nice, he is repenting for his dad too. What a man. The statute of limitations doesn't run out on murder and if Schaeffer is guilty of contributing to abortion Doctor George Tiller's murder, I suggest Schaeffer man-up and turn himself in.

It is sad to see Huffington Post induge this man who is clearly driving himself crazy with his past conduct. He seems to need psychiatric assistance more than he needs the opportunity to blog at the Huffington Post. Will someone lure that man down from the ledge please?

Of course, Schaeffer hasn't said much about the slaughter of viable babies by Doctor George Tiller. No surprise there! In the depraved mind of leftists people who actually slaughter the innocent are innocent, and people who never laid a finger on anyone are guilty.

We know that George Tiller slaughtered more innocents than any crazy right-winger ever did even WITH Schaeffer's advice. And, by the way, if Schaeffer really believes that he and his dad promoted murder, why didn't he and dad murder folks? Too sissified?

If Frank Schaeffer is guilty of contributing to the death of George Tiller isn't he also guilty of contributing to the death of private William Long? After all, Bill Ayers believed in killing people in the defense department AND promoted it and Long was a member of the the defense department. And Bill Ayers is a leftist and so are Schaeffer, Obama, and democrats. Therefore Schaeffer is guilty?

I think they should all turn themselves in, just to be consistent and just to be safe.

Poor Mr. Schaeffer, he appears to be contributing to just about everyones' death these days.

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.
.

The Edict of Sotomayor

2009-05-28T08:10:00.000-07:00

I, Princess Isaidso, on this 28th day of May in the year of our Lord 2009 do hereby issue the Edit of Sotomayor.

In this, my beloved Princessdom, English is the language spoken by all loyal subjects (though learning foreign languages is a pleasing and necessary activity).

Ms. Sotomayor's name will therefore be pronounced as the English would likely say it (as opposed to how "Latinos", the French, the Germans, or any other lovely foreigners would.)

Henceforth, all pronounciations of Ms. Sotomayor's name will be as such (phonetically): Sew`-toe-may-er.
.

Democrats Need a War To Provide Cover for Government Insolvency: North Korea to the Rescue

2009-05-27T13:04:00.000-07:00

Oh dear. It looks like the most belligerent and warring political party in America (the democrats) might trigger a nuclear war with North Korea if they are not careful. What is Hillary Clinton doing making inflammatory statements in public against a madman in Korea with nukes? Communing with a like-minded person?

May God forbid this.

Democrats, famous for getting America into most of the wars last century, don't seem happy unless they are shedding blood overseas. Don't cross a democrat. They don't like it when you disobey them. They cannot stand it when people do not do as they say. They will have you killed (Truman-Nagasaki) or steal your stuff (FDR) if you don't obey them. And don't think they care either. Bill Clinton and Madeleine Albright didn't flinch when Clinton/Albright approved sanctions were reported to have killed 500,000 children in Iraq which was then under the control of Saddam Hussein.

Let China handle this current problem with North Korea.

Even let the UN handle it---they are so smart and Democrats so love that little "hive of scum and villainy" (Obi-wan Kenobe, Star Wars).

Former President George Bush wanted Americans to get duct-tape; President Barack Hussein Obama could pass out shovels so we could start digging our bomb shelters or graves.

America is vexed because of her many sins, especially the ones Democrats promote.

Americans: Please bless our Creator and make your peace with Him, because the bloodthirsty democrats are in power and on the war-path again.

Here, in the Princessdom of Isaidsoland, peace and plenty reign.

This is because it is a Christian land.

Repent, America.

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.
.

Notre Dame Open-Mindedness: Running on Empty

2009-05-18T07:31:00.000-07:00

If Father Jenkins and the leadership at Notre Dame University really believed the Word of God—the Bible—they would have charged Obama with violating biblical principles instead of honoring him with a degree.

When John the Baptist stood before King Herod, he stood to tell Herod of his sin and lawlessness. John did not congratulate himself for being open-minded or for respecting government authority. John charged lawful authority (church and state) with immorality (violating the law of Moses). It appears that Notre Dame officials wouldn’t have the guts (or the presence of mind) to charge Obama with lawlessness—spiritual or otherwise.

Oh sure, they can probably quote the Bible as well as the Obama and the Devil can, but that’s a nasty old scheme real bible believers dislike greatly.

The mal-educated leadership (educators and students) at Notre Dame don’t seem to understand that there is a difference between honoring a dangerous subversive like President Obama and a decent human being.

Of course, when their own Catholic Pope (John Paul) kissed the same Koran that promotes polygamy, wife beating, violent Jihad, and sex with children, how can you expect wisdom from idiotic school administrators so low down the hierarchical line?

What’s next from Catholic “educators”? Proving their open-mindedness by providing honorary degrees for those who protected Catholic Church pedophiles?

The problem with open-mindedness is brains leak out.

UPDATE: June 3, 2009

The Catholic television network EWTN has a show called "Sunday Night Live". Last Sunday it featured Fr. Frank Pavone. He led a counter commencement protest against Notre Dame and President Barack Hussein Obama (who spoke at the "real" commencement ceremony). This gave pro-life students the opportunity to attend a commencement ceremony without having to listen to a pro-choice speaker foul-up the event.

Good for Fr. Pavone.

Now where are Catholic officials who should be punishing Fr. Jenkins and Catholic leaders who honored President Obama? Someone should be fired, defrocked, excommunicated, or whatever Catholics do to to each other when those in authority "flip the bird" at God.

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.

HATE ALERT: SUPER DUPER SEVERE!!!

2009-05-14T20:09:00.000-07:00

There is a hate epidemic in America, especially in the Democratic controlled Congress and Obama administration.

Anyone who supports any type of hate legislation in America is a dangerous, evil, and vicious hater. So beware of the haters under the leadership of the hater-in-chief, President Barack Obama.

Only haters vote for hate speech legislation!

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/04/30/social-conservatives-blast-hate-crime-saying-limit-free-speech/

Hate Alert! Janeane Garofalo Is An Unrepented Hater

2009-05-12T08:45:00.000-07:00

She's at it again! Ms. Garofalo was recently asked if she would like to apologize for calling all the tax protestors at the recent tea parties racists. Nope. She is not interested. She says that since they didn't protest while Bush was in office and spending too much money, that proved that the protests were because of racism.

Well, isn't she the clever one?

Apparently, there is no difference between deficit spending on constitutionally and temporary authorized war (which democrats voted for) and the endless unconstitutional welfare programs President Obama and the democrats are proposing. Who knew? It seems, Ms. Garofalo. Apparently, if you are not fed-up with government spending at the time Ms. Garofalo thinks you should be, you must be a racist.

Oh, and never mind that Obama is spending gazillions more than George Bush and his republican congress did. Perhaps if Obama spent less than GW then republicans wouldn't be such nasty racists? It also hasn't seemed to dawn on the hateful Ms. Garofalo that GW REDUCED peoples' taxes while Obama and democrats will raise the tax rate of many Americans. She cannot see the true reason for the protests, because she refuses to, is intellectually unable to, or blinded by her extremist ideology and the hate it engenders.

Garofalo also doesn't seem to realize that the war was a singular event added to the budget, while the extremist subversive programs President Obama proposes are meant to last for the life (or death) of the Republic. And she doesn't seem to know that many republicans did disapprove of the Drug Prescription benefit and the spending under the Bush administration. But these people are generally too busy working and shelling out their tax dollars for the greedy pigs slurping at the public trough. A trough Obama plans on expanding. Many protestors (and many who couldn't not attend the event) don't have the time to protest because they have to work harder to pay for the pick-pocketing taxation people like Ms. Garofalo may insist on.

You don't have to use the brains God gives you if you have an ideology that substitutes for them. But it seems that Ms. Garofalo has gotten rather far in life without have to think logically or draw the correct conclusions about the big issues in life. And so it is good she has gotten this far in life (recently appearing on the television show 24), because she will need all resources she has acquired. Once her looks go (it's starting), she will look and sound like a raving lunatic people will want to avoid. That can be a lonely thing.

She could always go on welfare though, unfortunately.

Corrections and revisions to blog posts occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.
.

Huffington Post: Hate Alert (Severe)

2009-04-30T13:27:00.001-07:00

Huffington Post (just added to Isaidsoland's Most Unwanted Extremists' List) is at it again with the hate-mongering.

This time the hate-monger (Bonnie Fuller) at Huffington Post is viciously and hatefully attacking conservative media elites. Oh the extremism! Call the DHS!

(Psst, if you are ignorant enough to think, believe, write, and post that Islam is a "race" you are qualified to write and post idiotic articles at the hate-mongering Huffington Post).

"OK, you ignoramuses: what you're saying is idiotic and racist on so many levels, it has to be called out.
#1. Why would we believe that Islamic countries or terrorist groups would have virologists capable of creating a new bio-terrorist flu? " Bonnie Fuller, Huffington Post

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bonnie-fuller/hate-mongering-conservati_b_192412.html

Additional reading:
http://www.vdare.com/rubenstein/060117_nd.htm (immigrants and disease/health care costs)
http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2001/nov01/01-11-07.shtml
http://newsmax.com/putnam/illegals/2007/11/29/53202.html
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2005/feb/12/20050212-112200-6485r/
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/swine-flu/5252137/Swine-flu-deaths-and-infections-around-the-world.html (with chart of global Swine Flu cases)

Corrections and revisions to blog articles occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.
.

The Edict of Huffington Post

2009-04-28T12:31:00.000-07:00

I, Princess Isaidso, on this 27th day of April in the Year of Our Lord, 2009, do issue this edict to declare that the Huffington Post is an extremist hate group.

All manner of wicked comments are permitted by their blog article writers, whilst comments to the contrary made by "members" (i.e registered readers) are exceedingly and strictly limited.

I, Princess Isaidso have no other choice but to put this hate group on my Princecessdom's Most Unwanted List (in position number ten--tsk, tsk, that's very bad indeed).

Corrections and revisions to blog articles occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.
.

Georgie Porgie Perez Pie

2009-04-23T01:41:00.001-07:00

I, Princess Isaidso, do closely identify with any lovely woman who wears the crown of her realm (or seeks to do so). And it has come to my attention that a fine young woman, the flower of American beauty, grace, and intelligence was at her closest moment in pursuit of the Miss America crown when the hateful extremist Perez Hilton viciously sought to derail her quest by asking her a rude question. He may have succeeded.

In Isaidsoland, people like Perez are ignored. No one hires them for work. No one gives them the time of day. And no one invites them over for tea.

Children look at the Perez's of the realm and wag their fingers at them declaring: "Shame on you!". Even they know such people are contemptible.

In our lovely realm we have a nusery rhyme that teaches our children to beware of hateful extremists like Perez, it goes something like this:

Georgie Porgie puddin' pie
Kissed the girls and made them cry.
When the boys came out to play,
Georgie Porgie ran away.

Cowards they are, perferring to terrorize the girls, and never to be gallant men when they grow up.

http://blog.heritage.org/2009/04/21/perez-hilton-smears-miss-usa-celebrity-juice-not-from-concentrate/

Corrections and revisions to blog articles occur frequently. Thank you for patience.
.

Rednecks and Ms. Garofalo

2009-04-18T10:11:00.000-07:00

There are many wicked persons in the world who would attempt to dethrone Princess Isaidso from her royal Princessdom. One such off scouring (who must be the heartache of decent parents) is Janeane Garofalo who tried this week to make something true just by "saying so".

This low person has slandered a good many of her fellow citizens who recently protested at the anti-tax and spend Tea Party events across America this week. She called them racists. Isn’t she clever? She said:

“Let’s be very honest… [The protests were] about a black man in the White House…This is racism straight up.”

Oh, isn't she brilliant? Even a third grader could have come up with that. In her delusional ranting, Ms. Garofalo (seeming to be on the verge of frothing, slobbering, and drooling like a rabid dog in her interview with Keith Olbermann) railed about the supposed ignorance of the white protesters. But it seems that these "ignorant racists" are probably a lot wiser than Ms. Garofalo who tells us that Barack Hussein Obama is a black man when he is not.

Maybe it takes being a dumb white redneck protester to know that Obama is as much a white as he is black? It is easy to show how racist leftists are.

For example, black offspring are snuffed out in the womb at a rate about five times that of whites. By-the-way, it can be considered genocide to force people to have abortions. I wonder why? Anyway, the vast majority of doctors offing black fetuses in the womb are white liberals. Democrats spin this slaughter of the unborn as a concern for blacks or for the child (I guess they think blacks are not up to the job of raising their kids?).

With these very high abortion rates for blacks, a Ku Klux Klan member might think it’s excellent if Ms. Garofalo supports abortion. It is no big surprise to many that the KKK and abortion arose from the Democratic Party.

"Dumb white rednecks", on the other hand, consider even the abortion of black fetuses in the womb a genuine evil. I guess dumb is good.

Next, there are welfare handouts. They have destroyed the black family and community. Democrats have done this themselves. And, of course, when it all began, it was mostly white democrats driving the black family to this destruction. Again, they spin this tragedy and devastation as a "right". They spin it as compassion. And again, it really says something unseemly about democrats' opinion of black people.

Dumb white rednecks (in Ms. Garofalo's viewpoint ?) generally believe that handouts hurt the poor of every race.

Ms. Garofalo and wicked people like her seem to be the racists they claim others are. Ms. Garofalo made mention (with Tom Brokaw, I believe) that there were only (or mostly) white people at these protests. And she clearly meant to insinuate that this was because republicans or conservatives are racists. But isn't she the racist and bigot for coming to that conclusion?

Isn't Ms. Garofalo implying that blacks are too stupid to choose which political party or political philosophy they prefer?

This reminds me of a white liberal neighbor who voted for Obama. When she talks about her associations with Hispanics, she refers to them as "my Mexicans" (she is not Hispanic). It always sounds to me like she is speaking about them like they were pets and not grown men and women.

Is this how some leftists think of "minorities"?

You can probably be a dumb redneck and still be smarter than the hateful extremist bigot, Janeane Garofalo.

That is situational awareness for ya. (Situational awareness is tough guy military lingo recently used by the hateful extremist Janet Napolitano when referring to devoted anti-abortion civilians who cherish life in all its many forms. Apparently, military tactics are being planned against these people already. Talk about violent extremism!)
.

Extremists Who Work for Obama

2009-04-16T16:37:00.000-07:00

Is this what Obama and Janet Napolitano really have in mind? Hat tip Lew Rockwell.

Thank heavens this type of government brutality does not occur here in Isaidsoland.

Corrections and revisions occur frequently to blog articles. Thank you for your patience.
.

Isaidsoland Threatened by Extremist Grannies with Cloth Shopping Bags?

2009-04-14T10:37:00.000-07:00

Really, little old ladies with blue hair and green in their hearts are not the wrinkled old dumb farts some say they are. After all, what's so bad about their habit of filling their shopping carts with booze and then handing their environmentally correct cloth shopping bags over to the cashier for packing? Why would they want a clean plastic bag to put their goodies in anyway? Do they think those little ladies are that dumb?

With the way some act, you'd think these old women's bags were lice or bed-bug infested sacks dragged around in the back of their nephew Bubba's truck. They act like these cute little ladies were getting their cloth bags out of Bubba's truck bed after his disease-ridden coon dogs laid all over them.

Heck, they act like people with tuberculosis, ebola, MRSA, lice, bed bugs, and parasites aren't as environmentally aware as our sweet little gals from the local senior center! Shame on them!

So grab your bags Isaidsolanders!

No! Not THOSE bags!

Corrections and revisions occur to blog articles frequently. Thank you for your patience.

Princess Isaidso Will Now Proclaim Who The Extremists Are

2009-04-14T09:33:00.000-07:00

There are many difficult jobs to do in the world, and I, Princess Isaido, do not shirk from my responsibility to accomplish what is necessary for the welfare of my Princessdom.

Since many are in the business of defining words willy-nilly and anointing themselves deciders of what labels they will slap on others, it is within the grand and glorious powers of dear Princess Isaidso to secure for herself the power to label others and define words within the boundaries of Isaidsoland (location unknown).

And so to my list of extremist groups (the Southern Poverty Law Center being number one), I must add the very naughty Department of Homeland Security which has seen fit to label those who will not condone the government of the United States' replacement of its population by immigration, as extremists.

It is extreme to call those loyal to their good kingdoms or republics, extremists. And this is true because I said so.

Corrections and revisions to blog articles occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.

Southern Poverty Law Center: #1 On Princess Isaidso's Extremist Group List.

2009-04-04T09:19:00.000-07:00

Most specialized groups use nifty and colorful jargon. It enhances group cohesion and helps make nerds look really cool. And if you don't wear tattoos or have a secret hand-shake and lack a gift-shop on your website that sells clunky mugs and cheap t-shirts, jargon is the next best thing.

In the world of politically correct jargon,extremist groups, in particular, will often use the undefined word "bash" in their postings. Extremist groups love, in general, to screw-up the language. Bash and bashing appear to be the latest fad used by extremist groups. Since we don't know what "bash" actually means when not referring to smashing something or keggers, we can only guess it means something immensely wicked that we don't want to get caught dead doing or BEING.

This once respectable word is now corrupted by extremist groups like the $PLC* who use it against people they, well, seem to hate.

It seems that the $PLC dislikes intolerance. The elephant in the room with that bright idea is that in order to dislike intolerance one has to BE intolerant of intolerance. But isn't tolerance the goal? It is likely that if you disagree with the $PLC's opinions about race, hate, and bigotry (or even if they think you disagree but you don't) they will probably call you a scary name that would make your momma cry. Yes, they are THAT opposed to tolerance. It seems that they haven't figured out that tolerance and intolerance MUST have a context and that they are a means, not an end. Sometimes tolerance is a bad thing and sometimes intolerance is a good thing. Yet, from the looks of it, the $PLC considers tolerance to be the preferred of the two. But back to bashing.

Even this doesn't clarify things for us. And here is an example of $PLC using the word "bash" (to "bash" people they do not tolerate?) :

"This wasn't the first time that immigrant bashers with virtual megaphones ignored the facts in spreading misinformation about the ongoing financial crisis." (4th paragraph, Larry Keller)

Doesn't that sound hateful and intolerant? Well, since I'm the Princess, I declare that it do. And you can be assured (in whatever measure you feel comfortable with) that "bash" is a word extremist groups tend to use. So if you see it pop up regularly in a particular group's literature, you can be fairly confident that they are probably the "bad guys".

* I got the "$" for the "S" in SPLC from Vdare online's website. They got it from someone else. I'll try to hunt that down. Honestly, I will, so please don't "bash" me. Be patient. I'll find it. Sometime. Soon. [Here it is (James Fulford).]

UPDATE: 4-5-09

Leave it to extremist groups like the $PLC to use facts and not know how to draw a righteous conclusion from them. From what I, Princess Isaidso, have discovered in this article by Takuan Seiyo, the $PLC article is just more left-wing nonsense.

What the $PLC doesn't tell its readers is that the Federal government threatens banks and mortgage companies and intimidates them so that they must loan unqualified minorities money for homes. The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) lenders didn't have to do all the lending that the $PLC said they didn't do. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac didn't need to loan as much as the private lenders because they knew that the government would strong-arm the lenders OR ELSE there would be charges of discrimination, more regulations, costly penalties, thuggish protesters outside homes, or incitements to send death threats to innocent family members. Gosh, that sounds like extortion. Thomas DiLorenzo covers the topic government" extortion"here.

Of course, as Seiyo points out, tax payers WILL end up paying for these "toxic" loans anyway. The CRA folks and the government could have saved us all a whole lot of trouble by making the bad loans themselves. At least the public might have had a chance to blame to the real culprits: the government and the leftists boobs who forced these bad loans. Yes, yes. George Bush is a lefist....um. Never mind. He's a leftist too.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=kegger
http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=1011
http://www.google.com/search?q=bash&btnG=Search&hl=en&sa=2
http://www.vdare.com/fulford/090304_fulford_file.htm
http://www.vdare.com/misc/080922_seiyo.htm
http://www.independent.org/publications/article.asp?id=184

Corrections and revisions to blog articles occur frequently. Thank you for your patience.

Welcome!

2009-04-03T16:05:00.001-07:00

I am Princess Isaidso (this is because "I" "said" "so").

Thus you get the idea. This blog is dedicated making fun of people (both powerful and not so powerful) who tend to think they have some special authority to define intangibles like hate, love, sharing, or greed. For what ever reasons, they often wind-up demonizing decent people and harming careers.

Their activities could lead to civil strife and threaten liberty. From Greg Hengler at Townhall online, we heard about president Barack Hussein Obama's comments at the G-20 about CEO's and the pitchforked-mobs in the streets. These comments (like the recent ones by Congressman Barney Frank and Senator Chuck Grassley) demonstrate how dangerous this business of demonizing people is becoming. Many of the people discussed here at the Princess Isaidso blog may incite violence or tyranny in the name of fairness, generosity, enlightenment, and concern. It is time to expose what their behavior may lead to.

And so I, Princess Isaidso, have decided to turn the tables on them by doing the same thing they have done: declare themselves the arbiters of intangibles.

Very truly yours,

Princess Isaidso (mistress of defining intangibles),